I'm developing a WPF application whose Window size and component locations must be dynamically calculated upon initialization because they are based on the main UserControl size I use and some other minor size settings. So, for the moment, I've placed those constant values in my Window code as follows:
public const Double MarginInner = 6D;
public const Double MarginOuter = 10D;
public const Double StrokeThickness = 3D;
public static readonly Double TableHeight = (StrokeThickness * 2D) + (MarginInner * 3D) + (MyUC.RealHeight * 2.5D);
public static readonly Double TableLeft = (MarginOuter * 3D) + MyUC.RealHeight + MarginInner;
public static readonly Double TableTop = MarginOuter + MyUC.RealHeight + MarginInner;
public static readonly Double TableWidth = (StrokeThickness * 2D) + (MyUC.RealWidth * 6D) + (MarginInner * 7D);
public static readonly Double LayoutHeight = (TableTop * 2D) + TableHeight;
public static readonly Double LayoutWidth = TableLeft + TableWidth + MarginOuter;
Then, I just use them inside my XAML as follows:
<Window x:Class="MyNS.MainWindow" ResizeMode="NoResize" SizeToContent="WidthAndHeight">
<Canvas x:Name="m_Layout" Height="{x:Static ns:MainWindow.LayoutHeight}" Width="{x:Static ns:MainWindow.LayoutWidth}">
Well... nothing to say. It works... but it's soooo damn ugly to see and I was wondering if there is any better solution for this. I don't know... maybe a Settings file, bindings, inline XAML calculations or whatever else... something that would make it just look better.
I usually put all static my application settings in a single static or singleton class called something generic, like ApplicationSettings
(or MainWindowSettings
if the values are only used by the MainWindow
)
If the values are meant to be user-configurable, they go in app.config and get loaded in the constructor of the static class. If not, I just hard code them in my static class so they're easy to find/change later on.
public static class ApplicationSettings
{
public static Double MarginInner { get; private set; }
public static Double MarginOuter { get; private set; }
public static Double StrokeThickness { get; private set; }
static ApplicationSettings()
{
MarginInner = 6D;
MarginOuter = 10D;
StrokeThickness = 3D;
}
}
For calculated values in your XAML, I typically use a MathConverter I wrote that lets me write a binding with a mathematical expression, and pass it the values to use.
The version I have posted on my blog is only an IValueConverter
, but it's pretty easy to expand into an IMultiValueConverter
so it can accept multiple bound values.
<Setter Property="Height">
<Setter.Value>
<MultiBinding Converter="{StaticResource MathMultiConverter}"
ConverterParameter="(@VALUE1 * 2D) + (@VALUE2 * 3D) + (@VALUE3 * 2.5D)">
<Binding RelativeSource="{x:Static ns:ApplicationSettings.StrokeThickness }" />
<Binding RelativeSource="{x:Static ns:ApplicationSettings.MarginInner}" />
<Binding ElementName="MyUc" Path="ActualHeight" />
</MultiBinding>
</Setter.Value>
</Setter>
Normally I would hide all this messy XAML in a Style somewhere, so it doesn't clutter up my main XAML code, and just apply the style where needed.
Here's a copy of the converter code I use for the IMultiValueConvter
// Does a math equation on a series of bound values.
// Use @VALUEN in your mathEquation as a substitute for bound values, where N is the 0-based index of the bound value
// Operator order is parenthesis first, then Left-To-Right (no operator precedence)
public class MathMultiConverter : IMultiValueConverter
{
public object Convert(object[] values, Type targetType, object parameter, CultureInfo culture)
{
// Remove spaces
var mathEquation = parameter as string;
mathEquation = mathEquation.Replace(" ", "");
// Loop through values to substitute placeholders for values
// Using a backwards loop to avoid replacing something like @VALUE10 with @VALUE1
for (var i = (values.Length - 1); i >= 0; i--)
mathEquation = mathEquation.Replace(string.Format("@VALUE{0}", i), values[i].ToString());
// Return result of equation
return MathConverterHelpers.RunEquation(ref mathEquation);
}
public object[] ConvertBack(object value, Type[] targetTypes, object parameter, CultureInfo culture)
{
throw new NotImplementedException();
}
}
public static class MathConverterHelpers
{
private static readonly char[] _allOperators = new[] { '+', '-', '*', '/', '%', '(', ')' };
private static readonly List<string> _grouping = new List<string> { "(", ")" };
private static readonly List<string> _operators = new List<string> { "+", "-", "*", "/", "%" };
public static double RunEquation(ref string mathEquation)
{
// Validate values and get list of numbers in equation
var numbers = new List<double>();
double tmp;
foreach (string s in mathEquation.Split(_allOperators))
{
if (s != string.Empty)
{
if (double.TryParse(s, out tmp))
{
numbers.Add(tmp);
}
else
{
// Handle Error - Some non-numeric, operator, or grouping character found in string
throw new InvalidCastException();
}
}
}
// Begin parsing method
EvaluateMathString(ref mathEquation, ref numbers, 0);
// After parsing the numbers list should only have one value - the total
return numbers[0];
}
// Evaluates a mathematical string and keeps track of the results in a List<double> of numbers
private static void EvaluateMathString(ref string mathEquation, ref List<double> numbers, int index)
{
// Loop through each mathemtaical token in the equation
string token = GetNextToken(mathEquation);
while (token != string.Empty)
{
// Remove token from mathEquation
mathEquation = mathEquation.Remove(0, token.Length);
// If token is a grouping character, it affects program flow
if (_grouping.Contains(token))
{
switch (token)
{
case "(":
EvaluateMathString(ref mathEquation, ref numbers, index);
break;
case ")":
return;
}
}
// If token is an operator, do requested operation
if (_operators.Contains(token))
{
// If next token after operator is a parenthesis, call method recursively
string nextToken = GetNextToken(mathEquation);
if (nextToken == "(")
{
EvaluateMathString(ref mathEquation, ref numbers, index + 1);
}
// Verify that enough numbers exist in the List<double> to complete the operation
// and that the next token is either the number expected, or it was a ( meaning
// that this was called recursively and that the number changed
if (numbers.Count > (index + 1) &&
(double.Parse(nextToken) == numbers[index + 1] || nextToken == "("))
{
switch (token)
{
case "+":
numbers[index] = numbers[index] + numbers[index + 1];
break;
case "-":
numbers[index] = numbers[index] - numbers[index + 1];
break;
case "*":
numbers[index] = numbers[index] * numbers[index + 1];
break;
case "/":
numbers[index] = numbers[index] / numbers[index + 1];
break;
case "%":
numbers[index] = numbers[index] % numbers[index + 1];
break;
}
numbers.RemoveAt(index + 1);
}
else
{
// Handle Error - Next token is not the expected number
throw new FormatException("Next token is not the expected number");
}
}
token = GetNextToken(mathEquation);
}
}
// Gets the next mathematical token in the equation
private static string GetNextToken(string mathEquation)
{
// If we're at the end of the equation, return string.empty
if (mathEquation == string.Empty)
{
return string.Empty;
}
// Get next operator or numeric value in equation and return it
string tmp = "";
foreach (char c in mathEquation)
{
if (_allOperators.Contains(c))
{
return (tmp == "" ? c.ToString() : tmp);
}
else
{
tmp += c;
}
}
return tmp;
}
}
But quite honestly, if these values are only used in a single form then I'd just set the values in the Loaded
event in the code behind the View :)
Put those static ones in the app.config, they'd be much cleaner in there.
Using app.config, you'd first have to have a reference to System.Configuration
.
Then you can do (there may be some type casting involved):
ConfigurationManager.AppSettings["MarginInner"];
To retrieve:
<configuration>
<appsettings>
<add key="MarginInner" value="6D" />
</appsettings>
</configuration>
Then maybe have a static class to hold the dynamic calculations, something like:
public class CalculationHelper
{
//your dynamic properties in here
}
mattytommo`s answer only addresses the constant values you have (margins and stroke thickness) but not the calculated fields.
I would, in conjuction with what Matty said, add a settings class that retrieves the constant values from the app.config file and also does the appropriate calculations needed and then I could reference the appropriate property in the XAML
i.e.
{ Settings.MainWindow.LayoutWidth }
EDIT :
it looks like Matty had the same though as he edited in between me posting ;)
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With