I created a fork of ecto
repository to extend Ecto.Changeset
module with the ability to add warnings to the changeset. I wanted to have an add_warnings/4
function which adds a warning to the changeset as a simple list of warnings with this structure warnings: [{atom, {String.t, Keyword.t}}]
, similar to errors
. The difference between the behavior of warnings
and errors
is that when an error occurs the data are not persisted, but when a warning occurs the data are persisted.
Ecto.Changeset
struct extended with keys warnings
and warningless?
:
defstruct valid?: false, warningless?: false, data: nil, params: nil, changes: %{}, repo: nil,
errors: [], warnings: [], validations: [], required: [], prepare: [],
constraints: [], filters: %{}, action: nil, types: nil,
empty_values: @empty_values
Ecto functions for casting, changing, processing params, etc. adjusted. Function add_warnings/4
added:
@spec add_warning(t, atom, String.t, Keyword.t) :: t
def add_warning(%{warnings: warnings} = changeset, key, message, keys \\ []) when is_binary(message) do
%{changeset | warnings: [{key, {message, keys}}|warnings], warningless?: false}
end
The result is that I receive changeset
with expected keys:
#Ecto.Changeset<action: nil, changes: %{}, data: #Company.Booking<>, errors: [],
valid?: true, warnings: [], warningless?: true>
When I make a change with error and warning I receive:
#Ecto.Changeset<action: nil,
changes: %{pickup_address: #Ecto.Changeset<action: :update,
changes: %{street_name: nil}, data: #Company.Address<>,
errors: [street_name: {"can't be blank", [validation: :required]}],
valid?: false,
warnings: [phone_number: {"This phone number is not common in Netherlands",
[]}], warningless?: false>}, data: #Company.Booking<>, errors: [],
valid?: false, warnings: [], warningless?: true>
So, everything is as expected, as far as warnings are concerned. Then, when I make a change with a warning but without an error, I receive:
#Ecto.Changeset<action: nil,
changes: %{pickup_address: #Ecto.Changeset<action: :update,
changes: %{street_name: "sss"}, data: #Company.Address<>, errors: [],
valid?: true,
warnings: [phone_number: {"This phone number is not common in Netherlands",
[]}], warningless?: false>}, data: #Company.Booking<>, errors: [],
valid?: true, warnings: [], warningless?: true>
Everything is as expected. When I don't make any changes to the form I still should receive a warning for phone number, but I receive:
#Ecto.Changeset<action: nil, changes: %{}, data: #Company.Booking<>, errors: [],
valid?: true, warnings: [], warningless?: true>
I got a changeset without any warnings as there is no changes
key in changeset because the data didn't change.
The question is as follows, how to implement warnings functionality to always have warnings in the changeset, even if no change was made?
You should consider to prefill the warnings at the very beginning of the each changeset
function you would create - since you can't use plug
there you can come up to write a macro that will handle this logic for you, __using__
is advised, so it would be quite easy to distinguish your logic from Ecto's default logic.
Your validation shouldn't add warnings to warnings list, but you have to implement it another way around - if the field is fine, you would remove already existing warnings from this list. That way you would be sure that your changeset is fine when it's warningless
, because it removed all the warnings from this list and it would works perfectly for empty changes in changeset.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With