Logo Questions Linux Laravel Mysql Ubuntu Git Menu
 

EBP, ESP and stack frame in assembly

I have a few questions about EBP, ESP and stack frame in following code.

  1. Why did we subtract 28 from esp? We have two local variables x and y in main. So why didn't we subtract 8?

  2. And don't we put values to stack from right (or top) to left (or bottom)? So why did we add 1 to [eax+8] instead of [eax+4]?


func(int a, int b, int c)
{
  return a+b+c;
}
main()
{
 int x, y=3;
 x=func(y,2,1);
}

Passing Parameters in Assembly

like image 839
Figen Güngör Avatar asked Jan 06 '13 18:01

Figen Güngör


1 Answers

  1. The stack pointer is subtracted by 28 because you need 8 bytes for your two local variables and 12 bytes for the parameters to func. The extra 8 bytes are likely due to your compiler's attempt to align main's stack to a 16-byte boundary (there's already 4 bytes on the stack for main's return address and another 4 bytes when EBP was pushed to establish the stack frame in main's first instruction). See -mpreferred-stack-boundary if you're using GCC.

  2. The parameters are being passed right-to-left. Since the stack space was already allocated for the three parameters when it was subtracted from the stack pointer, 1 is moved into the "highest" position relative to the current stack pointer (+8), 2 is moved into the middle (+4), and the value in y is moved into the stack pointer itself. This is the same as pushing 1 on the stack, pushing 2 on the stack, and then pushing y on the stack. By the last push instruction, 1 is +8 from ESP, 2 is +4 from ESP, and y is +0 from ESP. Note that inside of func, it has to add 8 to these offsets because the return address is pushed on the stack from the call instruction and func pushes EBP to establish a stack frame.

  3. Confused about which structure?

like image 173
Peter Huene Avatar answered Sep 23 '22 08:09

Peter Huene