In Django, the suggested software architecture is to put all business logic and data access in models.
But, some colleagues have suggested that the data access layer should be separate from the business logic (business service layer). Their justification is that the data access layer can isolate changes if a different data source is used. They also say that there is business logic that can be in more than one model.
But, when I start coding using the separate data access and business logic layers, the data access layer is simple (basically the model code that defines the db schema) and it does not seem to add much value.
Is there really value in separating out the data access from django models or does django already provide a sufficient data access layer with its ORM?
I'm looking for developers that have implemented a fair number of django apps and find out what their opinion is. This is for a small to medium sized web app.
The business layer As a rule-of-thumb, your application logic should live in modules that aren't Django-specific modules (eg not in views.py , models.py or forms.py ). If I had my way, Django would create an empty business_logic.py in each new app to encourage this.
Querysets are used very often in a Django framework.
In Django, a model is a class which is used to contain essential fields and methods. Each model class maps to a single table in the database. Django Model is a subclass of django.
Business logic should live in the data model. And, what's more, it should live in the graph data model because that's the right abstraction for the next twenty years.
After three years of Django development, I've learned the following.
The ORM is the access layer. Nothing more is needed.
50% of the business logic goes in the model. Some of this is repeated or amplified in the Forms.
20% of the business logic goes in Forms. All data validation, for example, is in the forms. In some cases, the forms will narrow a general domain (allowed in the model) to some subset that's specific to the problem, the business or the industry.
20% of the business logic winds up in other modules in the application. These modules are above the models and forms, but below the view functions, RESTful web services and command-line apps.
10% of the business logic winds up in command-line apps using the management command interface. This is file loads, extracts, and random bulk changes.
It's very important that view functions and RESTful web services do approximately nothing. They use models, forms, and other modules as much as possible. The view functions and RESTful web services are limited to dealing with the vagaries of HTTP and the various data formats (JSON, HTML, XML, YAML, whatever.)
Trying to invent Yet Another Access Layer is a zero-value exercise.
The answer depends on the requirements of your application.
For applications which will always use relational databases and can be coupled with a specific ORM, you do not need to separate data access and models. Django ORM is based on the active record design pattern, which supposes data access and model are together. Pro is simplicity, con is less flexibility.
Separating data access and model is only necessary when developer wants to uncouple completely data access layer and business logic. You can do it with the data mapper design pattern. Some ORMs support this design pattern, such as SQLAlchemy. Pro is more flexibility, con is more complexity.
I recommend the book "Patterns of Enterprise Application Architecture" written by Martin Fowler for more details.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With