I was going through sklearn class DecisionTreeClassifier.
Looking at parameters for the class, we have two parameters min_samples_split and min_samples_leaf. Basic idea behind them looks similar, you specify a minimum number of samples required to decide a node to be leaf or split further.
Why do we need two parameters when one implies the other?. Is there any reason or scenario which distinguish them?.
The main difference between the two is that min_samples_leaf guarantees a minimum number of samples in a leaf, while min_samples_split can create arbitrary small leaves, though min_samples_split is more common in the literature.
min_samples_split. The hyperparameter min_samples_split is used to set the minimum number of samples required to split an internal node. This can vary between two extremes, i.e., considering only one sample at each node vs. considering all of the samples at each node - for a given attribute.
min_weight_fraction_leaf is the fraction of the input samples required to be at a leaf node where weights are determined by sample_weight, this is a way to deal with class imbalance.
Both parameters will produce similar results, the difference is the point of view.
The min_samples_split parameter will evaluate the number of samples in the node, and if the number is less than the minimum the split will be avoided and the node will be a leaf.
The min_samples_leaf parameter checks before the node is generated, that is, if the possible split results in a child with fewer samples, the split will be avoided (since the minimum number of samples for the child to be a leaf has not been reached) and the node will be replaced by a leaf.
In all cases, when we have samples with more than one Class in a leaf, the Final Class will be the most likely to happen, according to the samples that reached it in training.
From the documentation:
The main difference between the two is that
min_samples_leaf
guarantees a minimum number of samples in a leaf, whilemin_samples_split
can create arbitrary small leaves, thoughmin_samples_split
is more common in the literature.
To get a grasp of this piece of documentation I think you should make the distinction between a leaf (also called external node) and an internal node. An internal node will have further splits (also called children), while a leaf is by definition a node without any children (without any further splits).
min_samples_split
specifies the minimum number of samples required to split an internal node, while min_samples_leaf
specifies the minimum number of samples required to be at a leaf node.
For instance, if min_samples_split = 5
, and there are 7 samples at an internal node, then the split is allowed. But let's say the split results in two leaves, one with 1 sample, and another with 6 samples. If min_samples_leaf = 2
, then the split won't be allowed (even if the internal node has 7 samples) because one of the leaves resulted will have less then the minimum number of samples required to be at a leaf node.
As the documentation referenced above mentions, min_samples_leaf
guarantees a minimum number of samples in every leaf, no matter the value of min_samples_split
.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With