An Observation
For medium-size matrices, the overheads on passing matrices from R to C++ are massively slower for arma::mat
types than for NumericMatrix
types. Like taking around 250x as long. Here's a minimal example
#include <RcppArmadillo.h>
// [[Rcpp::depends(RcppArmadillo)]]
using namespace Rcpp;
using namespace arma;
// [[Rcpp::export]]
double test_nm( NumericMatrix X ) {
return 0.0 ;
}
// [[Rcpp::export]]
double test_arma( mat X ) {
return 0.0 ;
}
// [[Rcpp::export]]
double test_nm_conv( NumericMatrix X ) {
mat X_arma = as<mat>( X ) ;
return 0.0 ;
}
Then, in R:
XX <- matrix( runif( 10000 ), 2000, 50 )
microbenchmark( test_nm( XX ), test_arma( XX ), ( XX ) )
Unit: microseconds
expr min lq mean median uq max neval
test_nm(XX) 5.541 16.154 16.0781 17.577 18.876 48.024 100
test_arma(XX) 1280.946 1337.706 1404.0824 1361.237 1389.476 3385.868 100
test_nm_conv(XX) 1277.417 1338.835 1393.4888 1358.128 1386.101 4355.533 100
So just passing a matrix as an arma::mat
type is around 250x slower than NumericMatrix
. That's crazy! So...
Questions arising
mat
so much slower than NumericMatrix
?arma::mat
for some fairly simple matrix algebra in a function that gets called a lot of times. I'm currently using arma
types throughout, and my code is much slower than I expected (that's how I ended up cooking up the dumb examples above). A speed penalty of 250x is such a big deal that I'm about to rewrite large sections of code to use NumericMatrix
types throughout. In fact, I might end up writing my own matrix multiplication function for NumericMatrix
and abandon arma
types altogether. But before I do, are there any better solutions?(Although I guess another way to read this is not that arma::mat
is slow to convert from R types, but that the NumericMatrix
type is amazingly efficient!)
I believe this creates a new Armadillo matrix then copies the contents of your numeric matrix.
To cast the NumericMatrix to type arma::mat, you should use the following:
// [[Rcpp::export]]
double test_const_arma( const mat& X ) {
return 0.0 ;
}
Speed comparison on my machine:
microbenchmark( test_const_arma( XX ), test_nm( XX ), test_arma( XX ), test_nm_conv( XX ))
## Unit: microseconds
## expr min lq mean median uq max neval
## test_const_arma(XX) 1.852 2.381 3.69014 2.7885 4.3490 11.994 100
## test_nm(XX) 1.925 2.455 3.47679 2.8535 3.5195 21.222 100
## test_arma(XX) 68.593 71.212 83.63055 73.4555 98.8070 278.981 100
## test_nm_conv(XX) 68.700 70.983 80.55983 73.1705 82.2665 183.484 100
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With