ConfigParser is the much debated vanilla configuration parser for Python.
However you can simply import config
where config.py
has python code which sets configuration parameters.
What are the pros\cons of these two approaches of configuration? When should I choose each?
The configparser module from Python's standard library defines functionality for reading and writing configuration files as used by Microsoft Windows OS. Such files usually have . INI extension.
configparser comes from Python 3 and as such it works well with Unicode.
A Python configuration file is a pure Python file that populates a configuration object. This configuration object is a Config instance.
The biggest issue I see with import config
is that you don't know what will happen when you import it. Yes, you will get a set of symbols that are naturally referenced using a .
style interface. But the code in the configuration file can also do who-knows-what. Now, if you completely trust your users, then allowing them to do whatever they feel like in the config file is possibly a good thing. However, if you have unknown quantities, or you want to protect users from themselves, then having a configuration file in a more traditional format will be safer and more secure.
This completley depends on your needs and goals for the script. One way really isnt "better", just different. For a very detailed discussion on most of pythons config parsers (including ConfigParser
and config
modules), see:
Python Wiki - ConfigParserShootout
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With