My purpose is to chose between CruiseControl and Hudson as continuous integration tool for java desktop application. I have seen lots of reading comparing Hudson and CruiseControl. In terms of features and ease of use, Hudson seems the best.
But in terms of robustness, reliability with heavy configuration and finally in the long term, is this still true ?
My vote goes to Hudson.
I'd say go for Hudson and never look back.
We were using CruiseControl to build our libraries and applications. We were using it for C++ and Python development, not Java. Recently we switched to Hudson with very good results. The main features we liked were:
We started using CruseiControl two years ago. It was a lot of pain getting it started, and every change was painful. We then switched to Hudson. And I'm in love :-)
Asked myself the same question a couple of years ago and after reading reviews, comparing , etc I went for Hudson.
It was easy to configure, had no problem after several years, had only 4-5 projects configured so I'm not sure if this qualifies as "heavy configuration" as you're stating, but it worked smoothly for me.
I recently faced this same decision. I started installing both CruiseControl.NET and Hudson and would tinker with one, then the other. Pretty soon, though, I gained momentum with Hudson. We're now solidly using Hudson and I've not touched CruiseControl.NET any further (not that I was that far into it anyways). So I can attest that Hudson can be setup in a .NET world just fine.
I have been using Hudson for quite a while and am happy with it. I havent used Teamcity though.
If cost is a concern, then Hudson should be an obvious choice. The community contributions are very healthy.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With