Can someone explain how the signedness of char is platform specific?

Question

I recently read that the differences between

char
unsigned char

and

signed char

is platform specific.
I can't quite get my head round this? does it mean the the bit sequence can vary from one platform to the next ie platform1 the sign is the first bit, platform2 the sign could be at the end? how would you code against this?

Basically my question comes from seeing this line:

typedef unsigned char byte;

I dont understand the relevance of the signage?

Answer 1

Let's assume that your platform has eight-bit bytes, and suppose we have the bit pattern 10101010. To a signed char, that value is −86. For unsigned char, though, that same bit pattern represents 170. We haven't moved any bits around; it's the same bits, interpreted two different ways.

Now for char. The standard doesn't say which of those two interpretations should be correct. A char holding the bit pattern 10101010 could be either −86 or 170. It's going to be one of those two values, but you have to know the compiler and the platform before you can predict which it will be. Some compilers offer a command-line switch to control which one it will be. Some compilers have different defaults depending on what OS they're running on, so they can match the OS convention.

In most code, it really shouldn't matter. They are treated as three distinct types, for the purposes of overloading. Pointers to one of those types aren't compatible with pointers to another type. Try calling strlen with a signed char* or an unsigned char*; it won't work.

Use signed char when you want a one-byte signed numeric type, and use unsigned char when you want a one-byte unsigned numeric type. Use plain old char when you want to hold characters. That's what the programmer was thinking when writing the typedef you're asking about. The name "byte" doesn't have the connotation of holding character data, whereas the name "unsigned char" has the word "char" in its name, and that causes some people to think it's a good type for holding characters, or that it's a good idea to compare it with variables of type char.

Since you're unlikely to do general arithmetic on characters, it won't matter whether char is signed or unsigned on any of the platforms and compilers you use.

Answer 2

You misunderstood something. signed char is always signed. unsigned char is always unsigned. But whether plain char is signed or unsigned is implementation specific - that means it depends on your compiler. This makes difference from int types, which all are signed (int is the same as signed int, short is the same as signed short). More interesting thing is that char, signed char and unsigned char are treated as three distinct types in terms of function overloading. It means that you can have in the same compilation unit three function overloads:

void overload(char);
void overload(signed char);
void overload(unsigned char);

For int types is contrary, you can't have

void overload(int);
void overload(signed int);

because int and signed int is the same.