Can I use NHibernate's AdoNetTransactionFactory with distributed transactions?

Question

I am dealing with a strange issue related to NHibernate and distributed transactions in a WCF service. See Deadlocks causing 'Server failed to resume the transaction' with NHibernate and distributed transactions for more details.

One thing that seems to solve my problem is using NHibernate's AdoNetTransactionFactory, instead of AdoNetWithDistributedTransactionsFactory.

I believe that the AdoNetWithDistributedTransactionsFactory is involved with making NHibernate's second-level caching mechanism work right, but we're not using that. What (if any) other problems exist with using AdoNetTransactionFactory with distributed transactions?

Thanks for your time!

Answer 1

I notice that you mentioned from your other question/answer:

SqlConnection class is not thread-safe, and that includes closing the connection 
on a separate thread. Based on this response we have filed a 
bug report for NHibernate.

However, from NHibernate's documentation:

11.2. Threads and connections

You should observe the following practices when creating NHibernate Sessions:

Never create more than one concurrent ISession or ITransaction instance per database connection.

Be extremely careful when creating more than one ISession per database per transaction. The ISession itself keeps track of updates made to loaded objects, so a different ISession might see stale data.

The ISession is not threadsafe! Never access the same ISession in two concurrent threads. An ISession is usually only a single unit-of-work!

If you are trying to multi-thread the connection with NHibernate perhaps it is just not going to work. Have you considered a different ORM such as Entity Framework?

No matter what ORM you choose though, the database connection will not be thread safe. This is universal.

"many DB drivers are not thread safe. Using a singleton means that if you have many threads, they will all share the same connection. The singleton pattern does not give you thread saftey. It merely allows many threads to easily share a "global" instance." - https://stackoverflow.com/a/6507820/1026459

Answer 2

Using AdoNetTransactionFactory with distributed system transactions will cause those transaction to be ignored by NHibernate, which has the following consequences:

• ConnectionReleaseMode.AfterTransaction will not be honored. Instead, NHibernate will release the connection after each statement, and so will re-acquire a connection from the pool for the next one. Depending on your data provider, this may trigger escalation of the transaction to distributed.
• FlushMode.Commit will not be honored. Explicit flushes will be required instead. (Auto flushes before queries may still occur.)
• Works needing to be isolated from current system transaction will still be included inside it. (Unless the connection string Enlist property is false.) Such works may include id generators queries such as retrieving the next high value for a table hilo generator. If the transaction gets roll-backed, NHibernate may then use conflicting ids.
• The NHibernate session will not be able to correctly track locks it holds on entities. Considering itself outside of a transaction, it will consider it has no lock on them. So it may try (on user code request by example) to re-lock them with lower lock level than the one the transaction already holds on them in database. Not sure what outcome could result of that. (At best, ignored, at worst...)
• Second level cache will be disabled as soon as you start modifying data. NHibernate sort of "invalidate" cache entries in such situation, and re-enable them only on transaction completion, updated. But since it will not be aware of transactions...
• Some extensions (maybe Envers) may rely on NHibernate transaction events, and will no more work as expected.