This has to be something small, but I'm not getting it.
Why is this causing an unchecked cast compiler warning, when it has the exact same generic declaration as in Enum
's valueOf
?
public static final <T extends Enum<T>> Enum toValue(T for_value, String value) {
try {
return Enum.<T>valueOf((Class<T>)for_value.getClass(), value);
} catch(RuntimeException rx) {
throw new IllegalArgumentException(value);
}
}
Compiler warning:
R:\jeffy\programming\sandbox\xbnjava\xbn\util\EnumUtil.java:92:
warning: [unchecked] unchecked cast
Enum.<T>valueOf((Class<T>)for_value.getClass(), value);
^
required: Class<T>
found: Class<CAP#1>
where T is a type-variable:
T extends Enum<T> declared in method <T>toValue(T,String,String)
where CAP#1 is a fresh type-variable:
CAP#1 extends Enum from capture of ? extends Enum
R:\jeffy\programming\sandbox\xbnjava\xbn\util\EnumUtil.java:98: error: missing return statement
}
^
1 error
1 warning
It also happens in one or both of the generics are removed from the function call, such as
Enum.valueOf(for_value.getClass(), value);
This is the closest question I've found: Enum.valueOf throws a warning for unknown type of class that extends Enum?. This enum's type is known.
You should be calling getDeclaringClass()
, which will also fix the generics issues (it is specified to return Class<T>
). Calling getClass()
on an enum constant with its own methods defined can actually return a different class from the enum type.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With