So I have this directive called say, mySave
, it's pretty much just this
app.directive('mySave', function($http) { return function(scope, element, attrs) { element.bind("click", function() { $http.post('/save', scope.data).success(returnedData) { // callback defined on my utils service here // user defined callback here, from my-save-callback perhaps? } }); } });
the element itself looks like this
<button my-save my-save-callback="callbackFunctionInController()">save</button>
callbackFunctionInController is for now just
$scope.callbackFunctionInController = function() { alert("callback"); }
when I console.log()
attrs.mySaveCallback
inside my-save directive, it just gives me a string callbackFunctionInController()
, I read somewhere that I should $parse this and it would be fine, so I tried to $parse(attrs.mySaveCallback)
which gave me back some function, but hardly the one I was looking for, it gave me back
function (a,b){return m(a,b)}
What am I doing wrong? Is this approach flawed from the beginning?
So what seems like the best way is using the isolated scope as suggested by ProLoser
app.directive('mySave', function($http) { return { scope: { callback: '&mySaveCallback' } link: function(scope, element, attrs) { element.on("click", function() { $http.post('/save', scope.$parent.data).success(returnedData) { // callback defined on my utils service here scope.callback(); // fires alert } }); } } });
For passing parameters back to controller do this
[11:28] <revolunet> you have to send named parameters [11:28] <revolunet> eg my-attr="callback(a, b)" [11:29] <revolunet> in the directive: scope.callback({a:xxx, b:yyy})
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With