I have a forEach that calls a function. There needs to be a delay between each time it is called. I've put it inside a setTimeout inside the forEach. It isn't respecting the timeout after the first wait. Instead it is waiting once, then running all at once. I've set the timeout to 5 seconds and I am using a console to confirm. 5 seconds of wait, then several foobar console logs all at once.
Why am I getting this behavior?
var index = 0; json.objects.forEach(function(obj) { setTimeout(function(){ console.log('foobar'); self.insertDesignJsonObject(obj, index); }, 5000); });
What Jason said is totally correct in his answer but I thought I would give it a shot, to better clarify.
This is actually a classic closure problem. Typically it would look something like:
for(var i = 0; i < 10; i++){ setTimeout(function(){ console.log(i); },i * 1000) }
The novice would expect the console to show:
0 (0 seconds pass...) 1 (1 second passes...) 2 (etc..)
But that just isn't the case! What you would actually see is the number 10
getting logged 10 times (1x per second)!
"Why does that happen?" Great question. Closure scope. The for
loop above lacks closure scope because in javascript, only functions (lambdas) have closure scope!
See: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Closures
However! Your attempt would have achieved the desired output if you had tried this:
json.objects.forEach(function(obj,index,collection) { setTimeout(function(){ console.log('foobar'); self.insertDesignJsonObject(obj, index); }, index * 5000); });
Because you have access to the "closur-ed" index
variable - you can rely on its state being the expected state when the function (lambda) is invoked!
Other Resources:
How do JavaScript closures work?
http://javascript.info/tutorial/closures
http://code.tutsplus.com/tutorials/closures-front-to-back--net-24869
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With