#include <map>
#include <iostream>
template <typename T>
class A
{
static std::map<int, int> data;
public:
A()
{
std::cout << data.size() << std::endl;
data[3] = 4;
}
};
template <typename T>
std::map<int, int> A<T>::data;
//std::map<int, int> A<char>::data;
A<char> a;
int main()
{
return 0;
}
What is wrong with this? Without explicit instantiation it breaks at
data[3] = 4;Explicit instantiation solves the problem but the program breaks after
std::cout << data.size() << std::endl;what means that the static class template memeber
data
was instantiated.
There is no explicit instantiation in your code.
There is no order of initialization of instantiated static data members among other static data members. So your code has effectively undefined behavior: Depending on whether the compiler first initializes the map or a
, the reference to the map is valid or not.
See C++ Static member initialization.
I don't have Visual C++ handy, but I can see the same problem with your code compiling with GCC. You need the initialize the data member:
template<> std::map<int, int> A<char>::data = std::map<int, int>();
With this change, it compiles and runs correctly (for me on GCC on Linux).
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With