G'Day Mates -
What is the right way (excluding the argument of whether it is advisable) to overload the string operators <, >, <= and >= ?
I've tried it five ways to Sunday and I get various errors - my best shot was declaring a partial class and overloading from there, but it won't work for some reason.
namespace System
{
public partial class String
{
public static Boolean operator <(String a, String b)
{
return a.CompareTo(b) < 0;
}
public static Boolean operator >(String a, String b)
{
return a.CompareTo(b) > 0;
}
}
}
C programming language is a machine-independent programming language that is mainly used to create many types of applications and operating systems such as Windows, and other complicated programs such as the Oracle database, Git, Python interpreter, and games and is considered a programming foundation in the process of ...
In the real sense it has no meaning or full form. It was developed by Dennis Ritchie and Ken Thompson at AT&T bell Lab. First, they used to call it as B language then later they made some improvement into it and renamed it as C and its superscript as C++ which was invented by Dr.
What is C? C is a general-purpose programming language created by Dennis Ritchie at the Bell Laboratories in 1972. It is a very popular language, despite being old. C is strongly associated with UNIX, as it was developed to write the UNIX operating system.
C is a general-purpose language that most programmers learn before moving on to more complex languages. From Unix and Windows to Tic Tac Toe and Photoshop, several of the most commonly used applications today have been built on C. It is easy to learn because: A simple syntax with only 32 keywords.
String is a sealed class. You cannot inherit from it, and without the original source for String, you cannot compile a partial class of it. Even if you got your hands on the source (it's possible via Reflector or via Visual Studio symbol download) you'd still have problems, since it's a first class citizen in the runtime.
Do you really need < and > as operators on string? If so... why not just use extension methods?
public static bool IsLessThan(this string a, string b)
{
return a.CompareTo(b) < 0;
}
public static bool IsGreaterThan(this string a, string b)
{
return a.CompareTo(b) > 0;
}
// elsewhere...
foo.IsLessThan(bar); // equivalent to foo < bar
There is no way to replace any built-in behaviour of the compiler with your own. You cannot override existing built-in operators for comparisons, conversions, arithmetic, and so on. That's by design; it's so that someone can read your code and know that int x = M(); int y = x + 2;
does integer arithmetic, as opposed to, say, formatting your hard disk.
Can you explain why you want to do this? Perhaps there is a better way to do what you want.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With