I'm trying to write a macro that would allow me to do something like: FORMAT(a << "b" << c << d), and the result would be a string -- the same as creating an ostringstream, inserting a...d, and returning .str(). Something like:
string f(){
ostringstream o;
o << a << "b" << c << d;
return o.str()
}
Essentially, FORMAT(a << "b" << c << d) == f().
First, I tried:
1: #define FORMAT(items) \
((std::ostringstream&)(std::ostringstream() << items)).str()
If the very first item is a C string (const char *), it will print the address of the string in hex, and the next items will print fine. If the very first item is an std::string, it will fail to compile (no matching operator <<).
This:
2: #define FORMAT(items) \
((std::ostringstream&)(std::ostringstream() << 0 << '\b' << items)).str()
gives what seems like the right output, but the 0 and \b are present in the string of course.
The following seems to work, but compiles with warnings (taking address of temporary):
3: #define FORMAT(items) \
((std::ostringstream&)(*((std::ostream*)(&std::ostringstream())) << items)).str()
Does anyone know why 1 prints the address of the c-string and fails to compile with the std::string? Aren't 1 and 3 essentially the same?
I suspect that C++0x variadic templates will make format(a, "b", c, d) possible. But is there a way to solve this now?
You've all pretty much nailed this already. But it's a little challenging to follow. So let me take a stab at summarizing what you've said...
That difficulties here are that:
We are playing with a temporary ostringstream object, so taking addresses is contra-indicated.
Because it's a temporary, we cannot trivially convert to an ostream object through casting.
Both the constructor [obviously] and str() are class ostringstream methods.
(Yes, we need to use .str(). Using the ostringstream object directly would wind up invoking ios::operator void*(), returning a pointer-like good/bad value and not a string object.)
operator<<(...) exists as both inherited ostream methods and global functions. In all cases it returns an ostream& reference.
The choices here for ostringstream()<<"foo" are the inherited method ostream::operator<<(void* ) and the global function operator<<(ostream&,const char* ). The inherited ostream::operator<<(void* ) wins out because we can't convert to an ostream object reference to invoke the global function. [Kudos to coppro!]
So, to pull this off, we need to:
ostringstream.ostream.ostringstream.str().Allocating: ostringstream().
Converting: There are several choices. Others have suggested:
ostringstream() << std::string() // Kudos to *David Norman*ostringstream() << std::dec // Kudos to *cadabra*Or we could use:
ostringstream() . seekp( 0, ios_base::cur )ostringstream() . write( "", 0 )ostringstream() . flush()ostringstream() << flushostringstream() << nounitbufostringstream() << unitbufostringstream() << noshowpos#include <iomanip>] Reference: See "Insert data with format" 1/3 of the way down on this webpage.
We cannot use:
operator<<( ostringstream(), "" )(ostream &) ostringstream()Appending: Straightforward now.
Converting back: We could just use (ostringstream&). But a dynamic_cast would be safer. In the unlikely event dynamic_cast returned NULL (it shouldn't), the following .str() will trigger a coredump.
Invoking str(): Guess.
Putting it all together.
#define FORMAT(ITEMS) \
( ( dynamic_cast<ostringstream &> ( \
ostringstream() . seekp( 0, ios_base::cur ) << ITEMS ) \
) . str() )
References:
ostringstreamostream::operator<<()
.
Here is what I use. It all fits into one tidy class definition in a header file.
update: major improvement to the code thanks to litb.
// makestring.h:
class MakeString
{
public:
std::stringstream stream;
operator std::string() const { return stream.str(); }
template<class T>
MakeString& operator<<(T const& VAR) { stream << VAR; return *this; }
};
Here is how it is used:
string myString = MakeString() << a << "b" << c << d;
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With