Where is the best place to implement caching in a web based app?
I'm going to use something like memcached or MS Velocity under the hood.
I'm just finding myself writing so much code to update the cache here and there in the business logic layer, so would it be better to create a fabric in between the data access layer at the Database Server to cache data?
I think these complications are down to the fact, most of the data we are caching is user specific and we are duplicating data in the cache. We struggling to find the best solution.
A cache-aside cache is the most common caching strategy available. The fundamental data retrieval logic can be summarized as follows: When your application needs to read data from the database, it checks the cache first to determine whether the data is available.
In computing, a cache is a high-speed data storage layer which stores a subset of data, typically transient in nature, so that future requests for that data are served up faster than is possible by accessing the data's primary storage location.
In-memory data caching can be one of the most effective strategies to improve your overall application performance and to reduce your database costs. Caching can be applied to any type of database including relational databases such as Amazon RDS or NoSQL databases such as Amazon DynamoDB, MongoDB and Apache Cassandra.
Memcached, MongoDB, RabbitMQ, Hazelcast, and Cassandra are the most popular alternatives and competitors to Redis.
Cache is an important part or a web app, but there is no magical solution that will fit every project. Working on optimisations before your app is working is usually a bad idea. Before asking yourself where you should implement a cache layer, the first step is to be sure that your application works well (even if slowly) without any cache optimisation.
When this first step is achieved, you can start profiling the app, listing the features that seem to be using a lot of resources (may it be CPU, memory, i/o, database access) or taking a lot of time to complete (usually because of the same symptoms).
Once you have a list of features that you think can be optimized with a cache system, there are two questions you need to ask yourself :
"How can I improve all these features at the same time" (macro focus): An obvious answer to this one is often data-access cache. You usually don't want to send the same query to your database server over and over again if the data you get in return is always the same. So storing this type of data in cache, with a clever lifespan, will always be a good idea.
"How can I improve each feature" (micro focus): This is tricky, and you need to understand your application very well to figure this one out. Some data can be cached, some shouldn't, some mustn't. A debugger and a profiler are usually great tools for this step, because they help you being sure why a feature is slow, and give you hints about how they should be optimized.
The optimisations you're going to figure out could be related to any layer of your application (presentation, business logic, data), but that doesn't mean you should implement them all. There are several important things you should take into account:
Once you have the answers to these questions, it's time to talk about this with your project manager, with your colleagues, or even with people that don't work on the application with you. Having neutral opinion is good, as well as having non-technical (or less technical) opinions. Talking with these people should help you figure out what should be done and what shouldn't.
At this point you should have a list of optimisations that's pretty clear, that you thought through several times, and you should have no problem coding and testing them.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With