I have this situation
@XmlType(name ="", propOrder={"value"})
@XmlRootElement(name = "compound")
public class Compound extends Value {
@XmlElements({
@XmlElement(name="simple", type=Simple.class),
@XmlElement(name="compound", type=Compound.class)
})
protected List<Value> value;
// ...
}
So a Compound is a List of both Simple and/or Compound. Both extend from Value that is defined as
public abstract class Value implements Serializable {}
Simple is a class marked with an adapter to marshal/unmarshal to/from a simple string
@XmlJavaTypeAdapter(SimpleAdapter.class)
public class Simple extends Value {
private java.lang.String simple;
// ...
}
Compound does not need an adapter.
The problem is that if I use a Simple 'as is', it correctly marshals/unmarshals as
<simple>my.text.here</simple>
but if I use it inside a Compound it outputs something like
<compound>
//...
<simple>
<value>my.text.here</value>
</simple>
//...
</compound>
And I'm just wondering why... Do I miss something? How can i remove that 'value'? It seems to me that the Adapter is not used at all, is it possible to use adapters in types marked inside @XmlElements?
EDIT
After few tests i found that the problem could be in how i handle a Simple instance. So I simplify my initial question in:
Given the a Simple class like
@XmlRootElement("simple")
public class Simple {
private java.lang.String innerText;
// getters/setters
}
how can i obtain a marshalled output like
<simple>
my.inner.text.here
</simple>
instead of
<simple>
<value>my.inner.text.here</value>
</simple>
?
It sounds like you want private java.lang.String innerText;
to be the @XmlValue of your Simple class. Try to annotate the String in Simple with the @XmlValue tag:
@XmlRootElement("simple")
public class Simple {
@XmlValue
private java.lang.String innerText;
//getters/setters
}
Or if you were using annotations on your getter method (which I assume based on your XML output in the question change your @XmlElement tag to a @XmlValue tag:
@XmlValue
public java.lang.String getInnerText() {
return innerText;
}
When I do this I get the output you are looking for in your edited question.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With