Menu
After reading Scott Guthrie's blog entry about the new Razor view engine for ASP.NET MVC and reading this question comparing the available view engines.
Razor seems to address most of the problems with the default view engine. What feature differences would make it a compelling choice for you as a developer? What features are lacking that would keep you from using it?
806
Razor is a markup syntax that lets you embed server-based code into web pages using C# and VB.Net. It is not a programming language. It is a server side markup language. Razor has no ties to ASP.NET MVC because Razor is a general-purpose templating engine. You can use it anywhere to generate output like HTML.
Razor is one of the view engines supported in ASP.NET MVC. Razor allows you to write a mix of HTML and server-side code using C# or Visual Basic.
RenderPartial function to render Partial View in ASP.Net MVC Razor. The data will be fetched from database using Entity Framework and then the Partial View will be rendered using the @Html. RenderPartial function in ASP.Net MVC Razor.
A view is an HTML template with embedded Razor markup. Razor markup is code that interacts with HTML markup to produce a webpage that's sent to the client. In ASP.NET Core MVC, views are .cshtml files that use the C# programming language in Razor markup.
Unit Testable: The new view engine implementation will support the ability to unit test views (without requiring a controller or web-server, and can be hosted in any unit test project – no special app-domain required).
At last!!! Can't believe it took almost 8 years for Microsoft to finally bring a view engine that supports this.
109
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With
