ARM assembly has SWI and SVC instructions for entering into 'supervisor mode'.
What confuses me is, why there are two of them? Here it is said that SVC was formerly SWI. Does it mean that basically they changed the mnemonic? Are they the same thing? Can I use them interchangeably? Does one of them exist before an architecture, and other after?
The Cortex-M cores support the SuperVisor Call (SVC) instruction, with that the user can trigger an exception. This can become handy if e. g. the core is in unprivileged mode and the program needs to access special registers, that only can be accessed in privileged mode.
The Software Interrupt instruction (SWI) is used to enter Supervisor mode, usually to request a particular supervisor function. The SWI handler reads the opcode to extract the SWI function number.
Software Interrupt (SWI) functions are functions that run in Supervisor Mode of ARM7™ and ARM9™ core and are interrupt protected. SWI functions can accept arguments and can return values. They are used in the same way as other functions.
SWI is particularly useful in the setting of trauma and acute neurologic presentations suggestive of stroke, but can also characterize occult low-flow vascular malformations, cerebral microbleeds, intracranial calcifications, neurodegenerative diseases and brain tumors.
Yes, SWI and SVC are same thing, it is just a name change. Previously, the SVC instruction was called SWI, Software Interrupt.
The opcode for SVC (and SWI) is partially user defined (bit 0-23 is user defined and is like a parameter to SVC handler). Bits 24-27 are b1111 and these 4 bits makes CPU to realize that the opcode is SVC (or SWI). see ARM Information Center for more details.
There is a good UAL vs pre-UAL mnemonic table on ARMv8 Appendix K6 "Legacy Instruction Syntax for AArch32 Instruction Sets"
One of the entries of that table is:
Pre-UAL syntax UAL equivalent
SWI SVC
which explicitly states that they are equivalent.
On GNU GAS, you can select the UAL syntax with .syntax unified
.
From GCC, you can use the option -masm-syntax-unified
for inline assembly, although it wasn't working in 8.2.0 due to a then fixed bug: How to write .syntax unified UAL ARMv7 inline assembly in GCC?
UAL vs pre-UAL also has further implications besides the names of certain instructions, e.g. the requirement for #
or not in certain integer literals: Is the hash required for immediate values in ARM assembly?
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With