Logo Questions Linux Laravel Mysql Ubuntu Git Menu
 

Apache Spark (Structured Streaming) : S3 Checkpoint support

From the spark structured streaming documentation: "This checkpoint location has to be a path in an HDFS compatible file system, and can be set as an option in the DataStreamWriter when starting a query."

And sure enough, setting the checkpoint to a s3 path throws:

17/01/31 21:23:56 ERROR ApplicationMaster: User class threw exception: java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Wrong FS: s3://xxxx/fact_checkpoints/metadata, expected: hdfs://xxxx:8020 
java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Wrong FS: s3://xxxx/fact_checkpoints/metadata, expected: hdfs://xxxx:8020 
        at org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileSystem.checkPath(FileSystem.java:652) 
        at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.DistributedFileSystem.getPathName(DistributedFileSystem.java:194) 
        at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.DistributedFileSystem.access$000(DistributedFileSystem.java:106) 
        at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.DistributedFileSystem$22.doCall(DistributedFileSystem.java:1305) 
        at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.DistributedFileSystem$22.doCall(DistributedFileSystem.java:1301) 
        at org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileSystemLinkResolver.resolve(FileSystemLinkResolver.java:81) 
        at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.DistributedFileSystem.getFileStatus(DistributedFileSystem.java:1301) 
        at org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileSystem.exists(FileSystem.java:1430) 
        at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.streaming.StreamMetadata$.read(StreamMetadata.scala:51) 
        at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.streaming.StreamExecution.<init>(StreamExecution.scala:100) 
        at org.apache.spark.sql.streaming.StreamingQueryManager.createQuery(StreamingQueryManager.scala:232) 
        at org.apache.spark.sql.streaming.StreamingQueryManager.startQuery(StreamingQueryManager.scala:269) 
        at org.apache.spark.sql.streaming.DataStreamWriter.start(DataStreamWriter.scala:262) 
        at com.roku.dea.spark.streaming.FactDeviceLogsProcessor$.main(FactDeviceLogsProcessor.scala:133) 
        at com.roku.dea.spark.streaming.FactDeviceLogsProcessor.main(FactDeviceLogsProcessor.scala) 
        at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) 
        at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62) 
        at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43) 
        at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498) 
        at org.apache.spark.deploy.yarn.ApplicationMaster$$anon$2.run(ApplicationMaster.scala:637) 
17/01/31 21:23:56 INFO SparkContext: Invoking stop() from shutdown hook 

A couple of questions here:

  1. Why is s3 not supported as a checkpoint dir (regular spark streaming supports this)? What makes a filesystem "HDFS compliant" ?
  2. I use HDFS emphemerally (since clusters can come up or down all the time) and use s3 as the place to persist all data - what would be the recommendations for storing checkpointing data for structured streaming data in such a setup?
like image 290
Apurva Avatar asked Feb 02 '17 15:02

Apurva


People also ask

Does Apache spark support Amazon S3?

With Amazon EMR release version 5.17. 0 and later, you can use S3 Select with Spark on Amazon EMR. S3 Select allows applications to retrieve only a subset of data from an object.

Does Apache spark provide check pointing?

If any data is lost, the recovery should be speedy. Spark streaming accomplishes this using checkpointing. So, Checkpointing is a process to truncate RDD lineage graph. It saves the application state timely to reliable storage (HDFS).

Does Apache spark support stream processing?

Apache Spark Streaming is a scalable fault-tolerant streaming processing system that natively supports both batch and streaming workloads.

What is the use of checkpoint in Spark Streaming?

A checkpoint helps build fault-tolerant and resilient Spark applications. Spark Structured Streaming maintains an intermediate state on HDFS compatible file systems to recover from failures. To specify the checkpoint in a streaming query, we use the checkpointLocation parameter.


3 Answers

What makes an FS HDFS "compliant?" it's a file system, with the behaviours specified in Hadoop FS specification. The difference between an object store and FS is covered there, with the key point being "eventually consistent object stores without append or O(1) atomic renames are not compliant"

For S3 in particular

  1. It's not consistent: after a new blob is created, a list command often doesn't show it. Same for deletions.
  2. When a blob is overwritten or deleted, it can take a while to go away
  3. rename() is implemented by copy and then delete

Spark streaming checkpoints by saving everything to a location and then renaming it to the checkpoint directory. This makes the time to checkpoint proportional to the time to do a copy of the data in S3, which is ~6-10 MB/s.

The current bit of streaming code isn't suited for s3

For now, do one of

  • checkpoint to HDFS and then copy over the results
  • checkpoint to a bit of EBS allocated and attached to your cluster
  • checkpoint to S3, but have a long gap between checkpoints so that the time to checkpoint doesn't bring your streaming app down.

If you are using EMR, you can pay the premium for a consistent, dynamo DB backed S3, which gives you better consistency. But copy time is still the same, so checkpointing will be just as slow

like image 177
stevel Avatar answered Nov 09 '22 07:11

stevel


This is a known issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-19407

Should be fixed in the next release. You can set the default file system to s3 using --conf spark.hadoop.fs.defaultFS=s3 as a workaround.

like image 44
zsxwing Avatar answered Nov 09 '22 07:11

zsxwing


This problem is fixed in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-19407.

However Structured Streaming checkpointing doesn't work well in S3 because of lack of eventual consistency in S3. It's not a good idea to use S3 for checkpointing https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-19013.

Micheal Armburst has said that this won't be fixed in Spark, and the solution is to wait for S3guard to be implemented. S3Guard is sometime away.

Edit: 2 developments since this post was made a) Support for S3Guard was merged in Spark 3.0. b) AWS made S3 immediately consistent.

like image 21
Jayesh Lalwani Avatar answered Nov 09 '22 07:11

Jayesh Lalwani