I have a test
table in MySQL with id and name like below:
+----+-------+
| id | name |
+----+-------+
| 1 | Name1 |
+----+-------+
| 2 | Name2 |
+----+-------+
| 3 | Name3 |
+----+-------+
I am using Spark DataFrame
to read this data (using JDBC) and modifying the data like this
Dataset<Row> modified = sparkSession.sql("select id, concat(name,' - new') as name from test");
modified.write().mode("overwrite").jdbc(AppProperties.MYSQL_CONNECTION_URL,
"test", connectionProperties);
But my problem is, if I give overwrite mode, it drops the previous table and creates a new table but not inserting any data.
I tried the same program by reading from a csv file (same data as test table) and overwriting. That worked for me.
Am I missing something here ?
Thank You!
Overwrite mode means that when saving a DataFrame to a data source, if data/table already exists, existing data is expected to be overwritten by the contents of the DataFrame.
Spark SQL is a Spark module for structured data processing. It provides a programming abstraction called DataFrames and can also act as a distributed SQL query engine. It enables unmodified Hadoop Hive queries to run up to 100x faster on existing deployments and data.
The problem is in your code. Because you overwrite a table from which you're trying to read you effectively obliterate all data before Spark can actually access it.
Remember that Spark is lazy. When you create a Dataset
Spark fetches required metadata, but doesn't load the data. So there is no magic cache which will preserve original content. Data will be loaded when it is actually required. Here it is when you execute write
action and when you start writing there is no more data to be fetched.
What you need is something like this:
Dataset
.Apply required transformations and write data to an intermediate MySQL table.
TRUNCATE
the original input and INSERT INTO ... SELECT
from the intermediate table or DROP
the original table and RENAME
intermediate table.
Alternative, but less favorable approach, would be:
Dataset
.df.write.saveAsTable(...)
or equivalent)TRUNCATE
the original input.spark.table(...).write.jdbc(...)
)We cannot stress enough that using Spark cache
/ persist
is not the way to go. Even in with the conservative StorageLevel
(MEMORY_AND_DISK_2
/ MEMORY_AND_DISK_SER_2
) cached data can be lost (node failures), leading to silent correctness errors.
I believe all the steps above are unnecessary. Here's what you need to do:
Create a dataset A
like val A = spark.read.parquet("....")
Read the table to be updated, as dataframe B
. Make sure enable caching is enabled for dataframe B
. val B = spark.read.jdbc("mytable").cache
Force a count
on B
- this will force execution and cache the table depending on the chosen StorageLevel
- B.count
Now, you can do a transformation like val C = A.union(B)
And, then write C
back to the database like C.write.mode(SaveMode.Overwrite).jdbc("mytable")
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With