Recently come across the following conundrum:
Standards
The Typescript documentation suggests creating object definitions with private members having an underscore prefix, allowing getters/setters to utilize the original 'name' of said members, providing indirect public access (as they should).
The Angular documentation recommends otherwise, however does not provide an example of using getters & setters for the private variable in their object definition example.
The Issue
I've been following the Typescript coding standard to the most extent. Take the following class for example:
public class Foo{
private _bar:string;
constructor(){ this._bar='Baz'; }
get bar():string{return this._bar}
}
Using the following code to serialize it into JSON:
console.log(JSON.stringify(new Foo()));
...will produce:
{
'_bar': 'Baz'
}
Questions
I've done a fair share of reading to other articles and StackOverflow posts regarding different ways of handling serialization, want to deter from the 'how', and rather ask 'why' with regards to the behavior mentioned.
Any feedback would be greatly appreciated! :)
Kind regards
It is not future-proof for small changes If you mark your classes as [Serializable] , then all the private data not marked as [NonSerialized] will get dumped. You have no control over the format of this data. If you change the name of a private variable, then your code will break.
There are three types of serialization in . Net : Binary Serialization, SOAP Serialization and XML Serialization.
Serialization allows the developer to save the state of an object and re-create it as needed, providing storage of objects as well as data exchange. Through serialization, a developer can perform actions such as: Sending the object to a remote application by using a web service.
Serialization is the process of saving and loading for state persistence of the diagram.
Serialization is the process of converting complex objects into a data format that can be easily stored or sent across a network connection. In JavaScript, serialization and deserialization of objects can be achieved by using JSON.stringify () and JSON.parse (). The Problem?
This first version of the framework known as AngularJS was launched in the year 2009. It laid the foundation of the present-day front-end application development. Angular JS was one of the best single-page application development solution. Gradually, it wide adoption and become very popular. What is Angular JS? What is Angular 2? Why not Angular 3?
AngularJS code can write by using only ES5, ES6, and Dart. We can use ES5, ES6, Typescript to write an Angular 2 code. Based on controllers whose scope is now over. Nowadays, the controllers are replaced by components, and Angular two is completely component based.
Angular 4 is a web application framework for building JavaScript applications. It supports TypeScript, which compiles to JavaScript and displays the same in the browser. It also provides navigation toolbar, auto-complete, menus and many more features. It is unlike Angular 2, which is a completely rewritten version of Angular 1.
You can customize serialization by implementing toJSON()
public class Foo{
private _bar:string;
constructor(){ this._bar='Baz'; }
get bar():string{return this._bar}
toJSON() {
return {bar: _bar};
}
static fromJSON(json) {
...
}
}
See also http://choly.ca/post/typescript-json/
Getters and setters are pure TypeScript language feature and entirely unrelated to Angular.
private
is only for static analysis in TypeScript. When it's transpiled to JS private
won't exist anymore. It becomes a plain old JS object and JSON.stringify
treats it like that.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With