The query returns the order in which elements are placed in their collection, ignoring the order of the initial array. This affects the function of our system. Is there any extra command to put it in the correct order? Is there any workaround available?
Here follows a simple example:
Collection1 Document
{
"_id":ObjectId("5c781752176c512f180048e3"),
"Name":"Pedro",
"Classes":[
{"ID": ObjectId("5c7af2b2f6f6e47c9060d7ce") },
{"ID": ObjectId("5c7af2bcf6f6e47c9060d7cf") },
{"ID": ObjectId("5c7af2aaf6f6e47c9060d7cd") }
]
}
Collection2 Documents
{
"_id":ObjectId("5c7af2aaf6f6e47c9060d7cd"),
"variable1":"A"
},
{
"_id": ObjectId("5c7af2b2f6f6e47c9060d7ce"),
"variable1":"B"
},
{
"_id": ObjectId("5c7af2bcf6f6e47c9060d7cf"),
"variable1":"C"
}
The query:
aggregate(
pipeline = '[
{"$match": {"_id": {"$oid": "5c781752176c512f180048e3"}}},
{"$lookup": {"from": "collection2", "localField": "Classes.ID", "foreignField": "_id", "as": "Collection2_doc"}}
]'
)
Returns:
Result's order:
[
{
"_id":ObjectId("5c7af2aaf6f6e47c9060d7cd"),
"variable1":"A"
},
{
"_id": ObjectId("5c7af2b2f6f6e47c9060d7ce"),
"variable1":"B"
},
{
"_id": ObjectId("5c7af2bcf6f6e47c9060d7cf"),
"variable1":"C"
}
]
Expected order (first document array order):
[
{
"_id": ObjectId("5c7af2b2f6f6e47c9060d7ce"),
"variable1":"B"
},
{
"_id": ObjectId("5c7af2bcf6f6e47c9060d7cf"),
"variable1":"C"
},
{
"_id":ObjectId("5c7af2aaf6f6e47c9060d7cd"),
"variable1":"A"
}
]
Are there any extra command ex. $sort
that could be used to return it respecting the original arrays order?
aggregate() method always returns Objects no matter what you do and that cannot change. However, that does not mean you cannot put them in an array and return the array in an object.
This is "by design" of the $lookup
implementation. What actually happens "under the hood" is MongoDB internall converts the arguments in the $lookup
to the new expressive format using $expr
and $in
. Even in versions prior to when this expressive form was implemented, the internal mechanics for an "array of values" was really much the same.
The solution here is to maintain a copy of the original array as a reference for reordering the "joined" items:
collection.aggregate([
{"$match": {"_id": ObjectId("5c781752176c512f180048e3") }},
{"$lookup": {
"from": "collection2",
"let": { "classIds": "$Classes.ID" },
"pipeline": [
{ "$match": {
"$expr": { "$in": [ "$_id", "$$classIds" ] }
}},
{ "$addFields": {
"sort": {
"$indexOfArray": [ "$$classIds", "$_id" ]
}
}},
{ "$sort": { "sort": 1 } },
{ "$addFields": { "sort": "$$REMOVE" }}
],
"as": "results"
}}
])
Or by the legacy $lookup
usage:
collection.aggregate([
{"$match": {"_id": ObjectId("5c781752176c512f180048e3") }},
{"$lookup": {
"from": "collection2",
"localField": "Classes.ID",
"foreignField": "_id",
"as": "results"
}},
{ "$unwind": "$results" },
{ "$addFields": {
"sort": {
"$indexOfArray": [ "$Classes.ID", "$results._id" ]
}
}},
{ "$sort": { "_id": 1, "sort": 1 } },
{ "$group": {
"_id": "$_id",
"Name": { "$first": "$Name" },
"Classes": { "$first": "$Classes" },
"results": { "$push": "$results" }
}}
])
Both variants produce the same output:
{
"_id" : ObjectId("5c781752176c512f180048e3"),
"Name" : "Pedro",
"Classes" : [
{
"ID" : ObjectId("5c7af2b2f6f6e47c9060d7ce")
},
{
"ID" : ObjectId("5c7af2bcf6f6e47c9060d7cf")
},
{
"ID" : ObjectId("5c7af2aaf6f6e47c9060d7cd")
}
],
"results" : [
{
"_id" : ObjectId("5c7af2b2f6f6e47c9060d7ce"),
"variable1" : "B"
},
{
"_id" : ObjectId("5c7af2bcf6f6e47c9060d7cf"),
"variable1" : "C"
},
{
"_id" : ObjectId("5c7af2aaf6f6e47c9060d7cd"),
"variable1" : "A"
}
]
}
The general concept being to use $indexOfArray
in comparison with the _id
value from the "joined" content to find it's "index" position in the original source array from "$Classes.ID"
. The different $lookup
syntax variants have different approaches to how you access this copy and how you basically reconstruct.
The $sort
of course sets the order of actual documents, either being inside the pipeline processing for the expressive form, or via the exposed documents of $unwind
. Where you used $unwind
you would then $group
back to the original document form.
NOTE: The usage examples here depend on MongoDB 3.4 for the
$indexOfArray
at least and the$$REMOVE
aligns with MongoDB 3.6 as would the expressive$lookup
.There are other approaches to re-ordering the array for prior releases, but these are demonstrated in more detail on Does MongoDB's $in clause guarantee order. Realistically the bare minimum you should presently be running as a production MongoDB version is the 3.4 release.
See Support Policy under MongoDB Server for the full details of supported releases and end dates.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With