I've been doing C# for a month now so please forgive the 'localness' to this question but I have researched for a couple hours and I have hit a brick wall.
I've seen examples left and right for Role-based authorization for WPF applications utilizing IIdentity and IPrincipal.
I can't find a lot of information, however, on a more Permission-based authorization approach, in this app imagine there are no Groups but just a list of permissions and users and you can assign anyone any permission.
I'd like to be able to:
Instead of:
[PrincipalPermission(SecurityAction.Demand, Role = "Administrators")]
I want something like:
[PrincipalPermission(SecurityAction.Demand, Permission = "Can add users")]
Right now the only way I see how to do this is utilizing ICommand and putting authorization logic in the CanExecute methods using a lot of string comparison to see if the user has the required rights to perform requested actions like:
// Employee class
public bool HasRight(SecurityRight right)
{
return employee.Permissions.Contains(right);
}
// Implementation, check if employee has right to continue
if (employee.HasRight(db.SecurityRights.Single(sr => sr.Description == "Can edit users")))
{
// Allowed to perform action
}
else
{
// User does not have right to continue
throw SecurityException;
}
I think I understand enum/flag/bits but not enough to complete the implementation...
If I have:
EmployeeModel
EmployeeViewModel
I'm not sure where everything goes and how to tie it all together.... here's what I have so far:
[Flags]
public enum Permissions
{
None = 0,
Create = 1 << 0,
Read = 1 << 1,
Update = 1 << 2,
Delete = 1 << 3,
User = 1 << 4,
Group = 1 << 5
}
public static void testFlag()
{
Permissions p;
var x = p.HasFlag(Permissions.Update) && p.HasFlag(Permissions.User);
var desiredPermissions = Permissions.User | Permissions.Read | Permissions.Create;
if (x & p == desiredPermissions)
{
//the user can be created and read by this operator
}
}
The reason why you're probably seeing lots of Role-based solutions is because that's a much more maintainable solution in the long run.
Rather than giving rights to individuals and having to manage each individual across an organization you can set up a handful of templates (roles) with different levels of authorization to an application's feature set.
Then you can just see whether a user is in that role or not as to whether he can do a certain action.
I know it doesn't help your question as directly as you probably want, but I would highly recommend using a similar solution.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With