Logo Questions Linux Laravel Mysql Ubuntu Git Menu
 

Would it be possible to have multiple database connection pools in rails to switch between?

A little background

I have been using the Apartment gem for running a multi-tenancy app for years. Now recently the need to scale the database out into separate hosts has arrived, the db server simply can't keep up any more (both reads and writes are getting too too much) - and yes, I scaled the hardware to the max (dedicated hardware, 64 cores, 12 Nvm-e drives in raid 10, 384Gb ram etc.).

I was considering doing this per-tenant (1 tenant = 1 database connection config / pool) as that would be a "simple" and efficient way to get up to number-of-tenants-times more capacity without doing loads of application code changes.

Now, I am running rails 4.2 atm., soon upgrading to 5.2. I can see that rails 6 adds support for a per-model connection definitions, however that is not really what I need, as I have a completely mirrored database schema for each of my 20 tenants. Typically I switch "database" per request (in middleware) or per background job (sidekiq middleware), however this is currently trivial and handled ny the Apartment gem, as it just sets the search_path in Postgresql and does not really change the actual connection. When switching to a per-tenant hosting strategy I will need to switch the entire connection per request.

Questions:

  1. I understand that I could do an ActiveRecord::Base.establish_connection(config) per request / background job - however, as I also understand, that triggers an entirely new database connection handshake to be made and a new db pool to spawn in rails - right? I guess that would be a performance suicide to make that kind of overhead on every single request to my application.
  2. I am therefore wondering if anyone can see the option with rails of e.g. pre-establishing multiple (total of 20) database connections/pools from the beginning (e.g. on boot of the application), and then just switch between those pools per request? So that he db connections are already made and ready to be used.
  3. Is all this just a poor poor idea, and should I instead look for a different approach? E.g. 1 app instance = one specific connection to one specific tenant. Or something else.
like image 864
Niels Kristian Avatar asked Feb 26 '20 19:02

Niels Kristian


People also ask

Can a database have multiple connections?

A database can be available to multiple connections in several situations. Multi-user database access is possible if Derby is running inside a server framework. A single application can work with multiple Connections to the same database and assign them to different threads.

How many connection pools should I have?

For optimal performance, use a pool with eight to 16 connections per node. For example, if you have four nodes configured, then the steady-pool size must be set to 32 and the maximum pool size must be 64.

Is it possible to use two databases in a single application in Ruby on Rails?

Rails now has support for multiple databases so you don't have to store your data all in one place. At this time the following features are supported: Multiple writer databases and a replica for each. Automatic connection switching for the model you're working with.


3 Answers

As I understand, there are 4 pattern for multi-tenancy app:

1. Dedicated model/Multiple Production Environments

Each instance or database instance entirely host different tenant application and nothing is shared among tenants.

This is 1 instance app and 1 database for 1 tenant. The development would be easy as if you serve 1 tenant only. But will be nightmare for devops if you have, say, 100 tenants.

2. Physical Segregation of Tenants

1 instance app for all tenant but 1 database for 1 tenant. This is what you are searching for. You can use ActiveRecord::Base.establish_connection(config), or using gems, or update to Rails 6 as other suggests. See the answer for (2) below.

3. Isolated schema model/Logical Segregations

In an Isolated Schema, the tenant tables or database components are group under a logical schema or name-space and separated from other tenant schemas, however the schema are hosted in the same database instance.

1 instance app and 1 database for all tenant, like you do with apartment gem.

4. Partially Isolated Component

In this model, components that have common functionalities are shared among tenants while components with unique or unrelated functions are isolated. At the data layer, common data such as data that identify tenants are grouped or kept in single table while tenant specific data are isolated at table or instance layer.


As for (1), ActiveRecord::Base.establish_connection(config) not handshaking to db per request if you use it correctly. You can check here and read all the comment here.

As for (2), If you don't want to use establish_connection, you can use gem multiverse (it works for rails 4.2), or other gems. Or, as other suggest, you can update to Rails 6.

Edit: Multiverse gem is using establish_connection. It will append the database.yml, and create a base class so that each subclass shares the same connection/pool. Basically, it reducing our effort to use establish_connection.

As for (3), the answer:

If you don't have so many tenants, and your application is pretty complex, I suggest you use Dedicated Model pattern. So you go for 1 app instance = one specific connection to one specific tenant. You don't have to make your apps more complex by adding multiple database connections.

But if you have many tenants, I suggest you use Physical Segregation of Tenants or Partially Isolated Component depends on your business process.

Either way, you have to update/rewrite your application to comply with the new architecture.

like image 190
KSD Putra Avatar answered Oct 23 '22 14:10

KSD Putra


Just a couple of days ago horizontal sharding was added to Ruby on Rails' master branch on GitHub. Currently, this feature is not officially released but depending on your application's Rails version you might want to consider using Rails master by adding this to your Gemfile:

gem "rails", github: "rails/rails", branch: "master"

With this new feature, you can take advantage of Rails' database connection pool and switch the database based on conditions.

I haven't used this new feature, but it seems pretty straight-forward:

# in your config/database.yml
production:
  primary:
    database: my_database
    # other config: user, password, etc
  primary_tenant_1:
    database: tenant_1_database
    # other config: user, password, etc

# in your controller for example when updating a tenant
ActiveRecord::Base.connected_to(shard: "primary_tenant_#{tenant.database_shard_number}") do
  tenant.save
end

You didn't add much detail about how you determine the tenant number or how authorization is done in your application. But I would try to determine the tenant number as soon as possible in the application_controller in an around_action. Something like this might be a starting point:

around_filter :determine_database_connection

private

def determine_database_connection
  # assuming you have a method to determine the current_tenant and that tenant
  # has a method that returns the number of the shard to use or even the 
  # full shard identifier
  shard = current_tenant.database_shard # returns for example `:primary_tenant_1` 

  ActiveRecord::Base.connected_to(shard: shard) do
    yield
  end
end
like image 43
spickermann Avatar answered Oct 23 '22 14:10

spickermann


From what I understand, (2) should be possible with manual connection switching in Rails 6.

like image 39
claasz Avatar answered Oct 23 '22 14:10

claasz