Is there a way to static_assert inside a class when the expression depends on the class type itself? Maybe delay the evaluation until the type is complete or after template instantiation?
Example code:
#include <type_traits>
template<typename T>
struct Test {
T x = 0; // make non-trivial
static_assert(std::is_trivial<Test<T>>::value, "");
};
int main() {
// would like static assert failure, instead get 'incomplete type' error
Test<int> test1;
Test<float> test2;
return 0;
}
Here's a solution using a helper class and a type alias for indirection. I believe this has no drawbacks.
template<typename T>
struct TestImpl {
T x = 0; // make non-trivial
};
template<typename T>
struct TestHelper {
using type = TestImpl<T>;
static_assert(std::is_trivial<type>::value, "");
};
template<typename T>
using Test = typename TestHelper<T>::type;
edit: Alternatively TestHelper can be moved into TestImpl:
template<typename T>
struct TestImpl {
T x = 0; // make non-trivial
struct Helper {
using type = TestImpl;
static_assert(std::is_trivial<type>::value, "");
};
};
template<typename T>
using Test = typename TestImpl<T>::Helper::type;
I was also looking for a solution with static_assert, but constraints work too:
#include <type_traits>
namespace Private {
template<typename T>
struct Test {
T x = 0;
};
}
template<typename T>
requires std::is_trivial<Private::Test<T>>::value
using Test = Private::Test<T>;
int main() {
Test<int> test1;
Test<float> test2;
return 0;
}
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With