Will the contents that are stored in the ThreadLocal
storage during an execution be cleared automatically when the thread is returned to ThreadPool (as would be expected) ??
In my application I am putting some data in ThreadLocal
during some execution but if next time the same Thread is being used, then I am finding the obsolete data in ThreadLocal
storage.
The ThreadLocal and ThreadPool don't interact with one another unless you do this.
What you can do is a a single ThreadLocal which stores all the state you want to hold and have this be reset when the task completes. You can override ThreadPoolExecutor.afterExecute (or beforeExecute) to clear your ThreadLocal(s)
From ThreadPoolExecutor
/**
* Method invoked upon completion of execution of the given Runnable.
* This method is invoked by the thread that executed the task. If
* non-null, the Throwable is the uncaught {@code RuntimeException}
* or {@code Error} that caused execution to terminate abruptly.
*
* <p>This implementation does nothing, but may be customized in
* subclasses. Note: To properly nest multiple overridings, subclasses
* should generally invoke {@code super.afterExecute} at the
* beginning of this method.
*
... some deleted ...
*
* @param r the runnable that has completed
* @param t the exception that caused termination, or null if
* execution completed normally
*/
protected void afterExecute(Runnable r, Throwable t) { }
Rather than keep track of all ThreadLocals, you could clear them all at once.
protected void afterExecute(Runnable r, Throwable t) {
// you need to set this field via reflection.
Thread.currentThread().threadLocals = null;
}
No. As a principle, whoever put something in thread local should be responsible to clear it
threadLocal.set(...);
try {
...
} finally {
threadLocal.remove();
}
Will the contents that are stored in the ThreadLocal storage during an execution be cleared automatically when the thread is returned to ThreadPool
No. ThreadLocals are associate with Threads, not with execution of a Callable/Runnable passed to a threadpool's task queue. Unless explicitly cleared - @PeterLawrey gives an example on how to do so - ThreadLocals and their state persist through multiple task executions.
Sounds like you can achieve the desired behavior with a local variable declared in your Callable/Runnable
No, the ThreadLocal object is associated to a thread and not a task. Hence ThreadLocal should be used carefully with Thread Pool. As a principle thread local makes sense with thread pool only when thread local life cycle aligns with life cycle of task
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With