Logo Questions Linux Laravel Mysql Ubuntu Git Menu
 

Will Microsoft continue supporting C++/CLI?

I've found C++/CLI to be a very powerful language for wrapping C/C++ libraries with .NET.

I believe it's much better than using PInvoke for C for various reasons.

However, when I've upgraded my project to Visual Studio 2010, I've found that it has less support for C++/CLI.

Examples:

  • Targeting the 3.5 framework with the Visual C++ 2010 compiler is not supported. - Won't be fixed.
  • No coverage highlighting. - Should be fixed in next version.
  • No Intellisense - 501921, 459187, 455686. By Design!
  • Useless CA1811 warning. - Won't be fixed.
  • Uselss CA1806 warning. - Postponed.

Microsoft claims:

I want to make it clear that while we can't address this issue, we reduced support for C++/CLI only due to time and resource constraints. This is NOT an indication that we are distancing ourselves from the technology.

But, C++/CLI never had really good support, and if the current version of VS has less support, what does the future holds?

like image 555
brickner Avatar asked Oct 14 '22 03:10

brickner


1 Answers

I doubt anybody has a truly definitive answer, even (for example) Herb Sutter, who works as an architecture on Visual Studio. The problem is simple: Microsoft's direction is determined (largely) by market pressures and customers. If a lot of people complain long and loudly about the problems, Microsoft will probably see fixing them as important -- and see C++/CLI as more important in general. If few people complain, chances are pretty good that they'll assume few people are using C++/CLI, and it'll remain marginalized.

To an extent, I think it's a self-fulfilling prophecy: they never really supported it quite well enough to make it a viable alternative, so it's never gotten a lot of use. That, quickly results in vicious circle of fewer users leading to less development leading to still fewer users...

like image 162
Jerry Coffin Avatar answered Jan 04 '23 07:01

Jerry Coffin