I have two classes:
struct B {};
struct D {
operator B& ();
};
When I do;
b = d; // B b; ... D d;
Result is as per expectation where D::operator B&()
is invoked (Demo).
If the D
is changed to,
struct D : B {
operator B& ();
};
then D::operator B&()
is not invoked (Demo). Is B::B(const B&)
is finding a better candidate in D
then D::operator B&()
?
If D
derives from B
, there is an implicit automatic conversion from D
to B
. This has higher precedence than a user-defined conversion operator.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With