I have two classes:
struct B {};
struct D {
  operator B& ();
};
When I do;
b = d; // B b; ... D d;
Result is as per expectation where D::operator B&() is invoked (Demo).
If the D is changed to,
struct D : B {
  operator B& ();
};
then D::operator B&() is not invoked (Demo). Is B::B(const B&) is finding a better candidate in D then D::operator B&() ?
If D derives from B, there is an implicit automatic conversion from D to B. This has higher precedence than a user-defined conversion operator.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With