I'll start by illustrating a simple use case example:
Consider the problem of a social security ID database, where in C++ code is modelled as a std::unordered_map
where its key is the social security ID of a person and its value is a std::string
with the full-name of that person (e.g., std::unordered_map<int, std::string> DB;
).
Consider also, that there's a request for printing this database sorted in ascending order based on the person's ID (i.e., std::unordered_map
's key).
Naively, one would think to use std::sort
in order to sort the std::unordered_map
according to the requested criteria and then print it, like the example code below:
std::sort(DB.begin(), DB.end());
for(auto p : DB) std::cout << "ID(" << p.first
<< ") - "
<< p.second
<< std::endl;
std::sort
with a range of either a std::unordered_map
or a std::unordered_set
will raise a compiler error.std::sort
?std::unordered_map
or a std::unordered_set
?From a logical standpoint, sorting an unordered container makes no sense. It's unordered. And the complexity guarantees that unordered_map is able to achieve require a very specific ordering that you shouldn't be, and aren't, allowed to mess with.
A) unordered_set cannot be sorted. You'd need to copy its contents into e.g. a vector , or use an std::set with your own sorting criteria. B) qsort is a C function.
The difference between an unordered_map and an unordered_set is that an unordered_map stores data only in the form of key-value pair while an unordered_set can store data that is not necessarily in the form of key-value pairs (example integer, string, etc.).
Unordered set is an associative container that contains a set of unique objects of type Key. Search, insertion, and removal have average constant-time complexity. Internally, the elements are not sorted in any particular order, but organized into buckets.
Sorting only makes sense for sequence containers, which are containers whose elements are determined by the order in which they were added to the container. The dynamic sequence containers in the standard library are vector, deque, list and forward_list.
Maps and sets, on the other hand, are associative containers, in which elements are identified by their value. Thus it makes no sense to ask for an "ordering", since the container elements aren't arranged in any kind of sequence. (It's true that an ordered map can be iterated in a comparison order on the key, but that order emerges from the container; it is not provided by the user.)
unordered
containers store internally hashed data and thus it's not possible to order them after the hash has been generated.
In order to sort the data you can use an additional non-hashed container (e.g. map or set) and either use them along with the unordered version (so you can use the normal one to sort the data and the unordered one to have fast per-item access) or you can do something like
std::map<int, int> ordered(unordered.begin(), unordered.end());
for(auto it = ordered.begin(); it != ordered.end(); ++it)
std::cout << it->second;
I recommend not to do the above often (unordered containers have slow sequential access)
https://stackoverflow.com/a/6212709/1938163
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With