Why would a method be made volatile? How does making a method volatile change the method's behavior?
Edit: I did a toString() on a Method object returned by a class object (Java Reflection). The return string had a volatile modifier against the method name along with public visibility and void return type. Research yielded only information on volatile for properties. This is why I asked this question.
The method declaration was:
public volatile org.osmdroid.api.IGeoPoint org.osmdroid.views.MapView.getMapCenter()
Code for the Reflection Method:
public static class Test {
public static void showMethods(Object target) {
Class<?> clazz = target.getClass();
for (Method method : clazz.getMethods()) {
if (method!=null) {
System.out.println(method.toString());
}
}
}
}
Method invocation:
Test.showMethods(mapView);
I strongly suspect that what you're seeing is a side-effect of the fact that the JLS defines the following bit for fields:
public static final int VOLATILE = 0x00000040;
and the following bit for methods:
static final int BRIDGE = 0x00000040;
Note that they have the same value (the same bit has a different meaning for methods and fields).
If you call e.g. Modifier.toString(int)
without, as the documentation suggests:
Note that to perform such checking for a known kind of entity, such as a constructor or method, first AND the argument of
toString
with the appropriate mask from a method likeconstructorModifiers
ormethodModifiers
.
then you'll get inappropriate output (including bridge methods, autogenerated for e.g. covariant return type, showing up as 'volatile').
At least the current OpenJDK Method.toString()
filters this out; if yours isn't, perhaps you're using a different or older version of the JDK which doesn't do this correctly.
You can't. volatile
is only a valid modifier for a field.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With