Little extended question is why jQuery do
jQuery.fn = jQuery.prototype = {
init: function() {...},
f1: function() {...},
...
};
jQuery.fn.init.prototype = jQuery.fn;
Why not simply add f1()
etc into init.prototype
? Is it only aesthetic or there are some deep ideas?
fn. init() {...} , is given the jQuery prototype so that its object 'type' is of jQuery , and that all instances of it are actually instances of jQuery .
fn is an alias for jQuery. prototype which allows you to extend jQuery with your own functions.
All objects have a prototype property. It is simply an object from which other objects can inherit properties. The snippet you have posted simply assigns an object with some properties (such as init ) to the prototype of jQuery , and aliases jQuery.prototype to jQuery.fn because fn is shorter and quicker to type.
The function jQuery.fn.init
is the one that is executed when you call jQuery(".some-selector")
or $(".some-selector")
. You can see this in this snippet from jquery.js:
jQuery = window.jQuery = window.$ = function( selector, context ) {
// The jQuery object is actually just the init constructor 'enhanced'
return new jQuery.fn.init( selector, context );
}
So, in fact, the line you mention is critical to how jQuery allows the addition of functionality to jQuery objects, both inside jQuery itself and from plugins. This is the line:
jQuery.fn.init.prototype = jQuery.fn;
By assigning jQuery.fn
as the prototype of this function (and because the first snippet uses 'new' to treat jQuery.fn.init as a constructor), this means the functionality added via jQuery.fn.whatever
is immediately available on the objects returned by all jQuery calls.
So for example, a simple jQuery plugin might be created and used like this:
jQuery.fn.foo = function () { alert("foo!"); };
jQuery(".some-selector").foo();
When you declare 'jQuery.fn.foo' on the first line what you're actually doing is adding that function to the prototype of all jQuery objects created with the jQuery function like the one on the second line. This allows you to simple call 'foo()' on the results of the jQuery function and invoke your plugin functions.
In short, writing jQuery plugins would be more verbose and subject to future breakage if the implementation details changed if this line didn't exist in jQuery.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With