I'm working on Project Euler Problem 14. Here's my solution.
import Data.List
collatzLength :: Int->Int
collatzLength 1 = 1
collatzLength n | odd n = 1 + collatzLength (3 * n + 1)
| even n = 1 + collatzLength (n `quot` 2)
maxTuple :: (Int, Int)->(Int, Int)->Ordering
maxTuple (x1, x2) (y1, y2) | x1 > y1 = GT
| x1 < y1 = LT
| otherwise = EQ
I'm running the following out of GHCi
maximumBy maxTuple [(collatzLength x, x) | x <- [1..1000000]]
I know that if Haskell evaluated strictly, the time on this would be something like O(n3). Since Haskell evaluates lazily though, it seems like this should be some constant multiple of n. This has been running for nearly an hour now. Seems very unreasonable. Does anyone have any idea why?
You're assuming that the collatzLength
function will be memoized. Haskell does not do automatic memoization. You'll need to do that yourself. Here's an example using the data-memocombinators package.
import Data.List
import Data.Ord
import qualified Data.MemoCombinators as Memo
collatzLength :: Integer -> Integer
collatzLength = Memo.arrayRange (1,1000000) collatzLength'
where
collatzLength' 1 = 1
collatzLength' n | odd n = 1 + collatzLength (3 * n + 1)
| even n = 1 + collatzLength (n `quot` 2)
main = print $ foldl1' max $ [(collatzLength n, n) | n <- [1..1000000]]
This runs in about 1 second when compiled with -O2
.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With