Logo Questions Linux Laravel Mysql Ubuntu Git Menu
 

Why is SQL Server losing a millisecond?

Tags:

sql

sql-server

I have a table structured like this:

CREATE TABLE [TESTTABLE] (     [ID] [int] IDENTITY(1,1) NOT NULL,     [DateField] [datetime] NULL,     [StringField] [varchar](50),     [IntField] [int] NULL,     [BitField] [bit] NULL ) 

I execute the following code:

BEGIN     INSERT INTO TESTTABLE (IntField, BitField, StringField, DateField)     VALUES ('1', 1, 'hello', {ts '2009-04-03 15:41:27.378'});       SELECT SCOPE_IDENTITY()   END 

And then

select * from testtable with (NOLOCK) 

and my result shows:

2009-04-03 15:41:27.*377* 

for the DateField column.

Any ideas why I seem to be losing a millisecond??

like image 966
sproketboy Avatar asked Apr 03 '09 19:04

sproketboy


2 Answers

SQL Server only stores time to approximately 1/300th of a second. These always fall on the 0, 3 and 7 milliseconds. E.g. counting up from 0 in the smallest increment:

00:00:00.000
00:00:00.003
00:00:00.007
00:00:00.010
00:00:00.013
...

If you need that millisecond accuracy, there's no pleasant way around it. The best options I've seen are to store the value in custom number fields and rebuild it every time you fetch the value, or to store it as a string of a known format. You can then (optionally) store an 'approximate' date in the native date type for the sake of speed, but it introduces a conceptual complexity that often isn't wanted.

like image 149
Whatsit Avatar answered Oct 08 '22 14:10

Whatsit


SQL Server 2008 has much more precision available. The datetime2 type will accurately store values like this: 2008-12-19 09:31:38.5670514 (accuracy to 100 nanoseconds).

Reference: time and datetime2 - Exploring SQL Server 2008's New Date/Time Data Types

like image 36
Rob Garrison Avatar answered Oct 08 '22 14:10

Rob Garrison