I have a table structured like this:
CREATE TABLE [TESTTABLE] ( [ID] [int] IDENTITY(1,1) NOT NULL, [DateField] [datetime] NULL, [StringField] [varchar](50), [IntField] [int] NULL, [BitField] [bit] NULL )
I execute the following code:
BEGIN INSERT INTO TESTTABLE (IntField, BitField, StringField, DateField) VALUES ('1', 1, 'hello', {ts '2009-04-03 15:41:27.378'}); SELECT SCOPE_IDENTITY() END
And then
select * from testtable with (NOLOCK)
and my result shows:
2009-04-03 15:41:27.*377*
for the DateField
column.
Any ideas why I seem to be losing a millisecond??
SQL Server only stores time to approximately 1/300th of a second. These always fall on the 0, 3 and 7 milliseconds. E.g. counting up from 0 in the smallest increment:
00:00:00.000
00:00:00.003
00:00:00.007
00:00:00.010
00:00:00.013
...
If you need that millisecond accuracy, there's no pleasant way around it. The best options I've seen are to store the value in custom number fields and rebuild it every time you fetch the value, or to store it as a string of a known format. You can then (optionally) store an 'approximate' date in the native date type for the sake of speed, but it introduces a conceptual complexity that often isn't wanted.
SQL Server 2008 has much more precision available. The datetime2 type will accurately store values like this: 2008-12-19 09:31:38.5670514 (accuracy to 100 nanoseconds).
Reference: time and datetime2 - Exploring SQL Server 2008's New Date/Time Data Types
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With