I don't have very much background regarding COM nor coclasses, so I don't quite understand why I can use the new
operator with an interface. From a language/framework-agnostic view, it's confusing why this compiles and runs correctly:
using Microsoft.Office.Interop.Excel;
public class ExcelProgram
{
static void Main(string[] args)
{
Application excel = new Application();
}
}
Inspecting Application
in Visual Studio 2010 shows me:
using System.Runtime.InteropServices;
namespace Microsoft.Office.Interop.Excel
{
// Summary:
// Represents the entire Microsoft Excel application.
[Guid("000208D5-0000-0000-C000-000000000046")]
[CoClass(typeof(ApplicationClass))]
public interface Application : _Application, AppEvents_Event
{
}
}
What is going on behind the scenes?
This is only possible for COM interfaces, I believe. Marc Gravell has an explanation here.
The short answer is that a COM interface can be paired with a "default" implementation class, so that when you "instantiate" the interface you're actually creating an instance of that default implementation class. In the case of the Application
interface in your example, that appears to be ApplicationClass
.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With