I was playing around with GZIP compression recently and the way I understand the following:
I understand that this is common practice, and it makes a ton of sense when you need to load a page that requires a ton of HTML, CSS, and JavaScript, which can be relatively large, and add to your browser's loading time.
However, I was trying to look further into this and why is it not common to GZIP compress a request body when doing a POST call? Is it because usually request bodies are small so the time it takes to decompress the file on the web server is longer than it takes to simply send the request? Is there some sort of document or reference I can have about this?
Thanks!
To compress the HTTP request body, you must attach the HTTP header indicating the sending of HTTP request body compressed in gzip format while sending the request message from the Web Service client. Implement the processing for attaching the HTTP header in the client application.
GZIP compression is a data-compressing process through which the size of a file is reduced before it is transferred from the server to the browser. So, a GZIP compressed file is smaller in size when compared to the original, thus the browser renders its contents faster.
GZip is a form of server-side data compression that's helpful in reducing page loading time. In other words, it takes a set of data and makes it smaller for more streamlined, efficient delivery to a user's computer. Gzip compression reduces the size of your HTML, stylesheets, and JavaScript files.
HTTP compression allows content to be compressed on the server before transmission to the client. For resources such as text this can significantly reduce the size of the response message, leading to reduced bandwidth requirements and download times.
It's uncommon because in a client - server relationship, the server sends all the data to the client, and as you mentioned, the data coming from the client tends to be small and so compression rarely brings any performance gains.
In a REST API, I would say that big request payloads were common, but apparently Spring Framework, known for their REST tools, disagree - they explicitly say in their docs here that you can set the servlet container to do response compression, with no mention of request compression. As Spring Framework's mode of operation is to provide functionality that they think lots of people will use, they obviously didn't feel it worthwhile to provide a ServletFilter
implementation that we users could employ to read compressed request bodies.
It would be interesting to trawl the user mailing lists of tomcat, struts, jackson, gson etc for similar discussions.
If you want to write your own decompression filter, try reading this: How to decode Gzip compressed request body in Spring MVC
Alternatively, put your servlet container behind a web server that offers more functionality. People obviously do need request compression enough that web servers such as Apache offer it - this SO answer summarises it well already: HTTP request compression - you'll find the reference to the HTTP spec there too.
Very old question but I decided to resurrect it because it was my first google result and I feel the currently only answer is incomplete.
HTTP request compression is uncommon because the client can't be sure the server supports it.
When the server sends a response, it can use the Accept-Encoding header from the client's request to see if the client would understand a gzipped response.
When the client sends a request, it can be the first HTTP communication so there is nothing to tell the client that the server would understand a gzipped request. The client can still do so, but it's a gamble.
Although very few modern http servers would not know gzip, the configuration to apply it to request bodies is still very uncommon. At least on nginx, it looks like custom Lua scripting is required to get it working.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With