A basic C++ 03 enumerated type is just an integral value with a fancy name, therefore I would expect to pass it by value....
For this reason I would also expect boost::call_traits<T>::param_type with T=SomeEnum to determine that the most efficient way of pass T is by value.
From boost documentation see Call Traits:
Defines a type that represents the "best" way to pass a parameter of type T to a function.
When I use boost::call_traits<T>::param_type with T=SomeEnum it determines that SomeEnum should be passed by reference.
I would also  expect C++11 class enums to also be passed by value.
Test Code:
#include <string>
#include <typeinfo>
#include <boost/call_traits.hpp>
#include <boost/type_traits/is_reference.hpp>
enum SomeEnum
{
    EN1_ZERO = 0,
    EN1_ONE,
    EN1_TWO,
    EN1_THREE
};
struct SomeStruct
{};
template<typename T>
void DisplayCallTraits( const std::string& desc )
{
    typedef typename boost::call_traits<T>::param_type param_type;
    std::cout << "-----------------------------------------------------\n";
    std::cout << "Call traits for: " << desc << "\n";
    std::cout << "\ttypeof T : " << typeid(T).name() << "\n";
    std::cout << "\ttypeof param_type : " << typeid(param_type).name() << "\n";
    std::cout << "\tis_reference<param_type> : " << std::boolalpha 
              << boost::is_reference<param_type>::value << "\n";
}
int main( int, char** )
{
    DisplayCallTraits< unsigned >( "unsigned" );     // pass by value, as expected
    DisplayCallTraits< SomeStruct >( "struct" );     // pass by reference, as expected
    DisplayCallTraits< SomeEnum >( "enumeration" );  // pass by reference - why?
    return 0;
}
                This has been updated to include a check to is_enum in the implementation. See this bug report, closed 2 months ago: https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/5790
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With