I have the following block of linq queries to calculate some values for a report.
var items = (from trans in calclabordb.Sales_Transactions
select trans).SelectMany(st => st.Sales_TransactionLineItems).Where(stli => stli.TypeID == typeID);
decimal test = items.Where(stli => stli.Inventory_Item is Base).Sum(stli => (decimal?)stli.Inventory_Item.IntExtraServiceAmount) ?? 0;
decimal test2 = items.Where(stli => stli.Inventory_Item is Extra).Sum(stli => (decimal?)stli.ItemPrice) ?? 0;
decimal test3 = test + test2;
current.ExtraSales = items.Where(stli => stli.Inventory_Item is Base).Sum(stli => (decimal?)stli.Inventory_Item.IntExtraServiceAmount) ?? 0 +
items.Where(stli => stli.Inventory_Item is Extra).Sum(stli => (decimal?)stli.ItemPrice) ?? 0;
I've stepped through the code in a debugger and I've noticed some oddities. After assigning into test
its value is 0. After assigning into test2
test2 == 0
and test == 11.31
after assigning into test3 test == 11.31
test2 == 11.28
and test3 == 22.59
after assigning into ExtraSales
ExtraSales == 11.31
. The value in ExtraSales
when this is all complete should be 22.59. What's going on here?
EDIT: I've added additional lines after the assignment into ExtraSales
but the value does not change.
The answers that say that this is a deferred execution problem are wrong. It is an operator precedence problem.
Get rid of all that completely irrelevant and impossible-to-read code in there. It is all red herring. The relevant repro is:
decimal? d1 = 11.31m;
decimal? d2 = 11.28m;
decimal test1 = d1 ?? 0m;
decimal test2 = d2 ?? 0m;
decimal test3 = test1 + test2;
decimal test4 = d1 ?? 0m + d2 ?? 0m;
What is the meaning of the final line? Does it mean the same thing as the line before it?
No, it does not. The addition operator is higher precedence than the null coalescing operator, so this is
decimal test4 = d1 ?? (0m + d2) ?? 0m;
The code you wrote means "produce the value of d1 if d1 is not null. If d1 is null and 0m + d2 is not null then produce the value of 0m + d2. If 0m + d2 is null then produce the value 0m."
(You might not have known that the ?? operator has this pleasant chaining property. In general, a ?? b ?? c ?? d ?? e
gives you the first non-null value of a, b, c or d, and e if they are otherwise all null. You can make the chain as long as you like. It's quite an elegant little operator.)
Since d1 is not null, we produce its value and test4 is assigned the value of d1.
You probably meant to say:
decimal test4 = (d1 ?? 0m) + (d2 ?? 0m);
If you mean "d1 or d2 could be null, and if either is, then treat the null one as zero". So 12 + 2 is 14, 12 + null is 12, null + null is 0
If you mean "either d1 and d2 could be null, and if either is null then I want zero", that's
decimal test4 = (d1 + d2) ?? 0m;
So 12 + 2 is 14, 12 + null is 0, null + null is 0
I note that if you had formatted your code so that the relevant text was on the screen, you probably wouldn't have gotten five or so incorrect answers posted first. Try to format your code so that all of it is on the screen; you'll get better answers if you do.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With