Does anyone know why this will not compile? I've tried both VS 2008 and GCC 4.something and both spit out errors. It doesn't matter whether or not I'm referencing "ThisFunctionDoesNotCompile()".
I can workaround this by just passing 'InternalType' as a second template parameter to Base, but I'm still curious why this comes up as an error.
#include <iostream>
using namespace std;
class DataClass
{
public:
int m_data;
};
template<typename DerivedType>
class Base
{
public:
int ThisFunctionCompiles()
{
// No problems here.
typename DerivedType::InternalType temp;
temp.m_data = 5;
return temp.m_data;
}
// error C2039: 'InternalType' : is not a member of 'Derived<InInternalType>'
typename DerivedType::InternalType ThisFunctionDoesNotCompile()
{
return static_cast<DerivedType*>(this)->GetInternalData();
}
};
template<typename InInternalType>
class Derived : public Base<Derived<InInternalType> >
{
public:
typedef InInternalType InternalType;
InternalType GetInternalData()
{
return m_internalData;
}
private:
InternalType m_internalData;
public:
void SetInternalData( int newVal )
{
m_internalData.m_data = newVal;
}
};
int main()
{
Derived<DataClass> testDerived;
testDerived.SetInternalData( 3 );
cout << testDerived.GetInternalData().m_data << endl;
cout << testDerived.ThisFunctionCompiles() << endl;
// The compiler gives an error regardless of whether or not this is commented out.
//cout << testDerived.ThisFunctionDoesNotCompile().m_data << endl;
return 0;
}
These are the errors I get in VS 2008:
1>e:\test\generaltestprogram\generaltestprogram\main.cpp(27) : error C2039: 'InternalType' : is not a member of 'Derived<InInternalType>'
1> with
1> [
1> InInternalType=DataClass
1> ]
1> e:\test\generaltestprogram\generaltestprogram\main.cpp(35) : see reference to class template instantiation 'Base<DerivedType>' being compiled
1> with
1> [
1> DerivedType=Derived<DataClass>
1> ]
1> e:\test\generaltestprogram\generaltestprogram\main.cpp(58) : see reference to class template instantiation 'Derived<InInternalType>' being compiled
1> with
1> [
1> InInternalType=DataClass
1> ]
1>e:\test\generaltestprogram\generaltestprogram\main.cpp(27) : error C2146: syntax error : missing ';' before identifier 'ThisFunctionDoesNotCompile'
1>e:\test\generaltestprogram\generaltestprogram\main.cpp(27) : error C4430: missing type specifier - int assumed. Note: C++ does not support default-int
1>e:\test\generaltestprogram\generaltestprogram\main.cpp(28) : error C4430: missing type specifier - int assumed. Note: C++ does not support default-int
1>e:\test\generaltestprogram\generaltestprogram\main.cpp(28) : warning C4183: 'ThisFunctionDoesNotCompile': missing return type; assumed to be a member function returning 'int'
And these are what GCC gives me:
main.cpp: In instantiation of 'Base<Derived<DataClass> >':
main.cpp:96: instantiated from 'Derived<DataClass>'
main.cpp:119: instantiated from here
main.cpp:88: error: no type named 'InternalType' in 'class Derived<DataClass>'
> For one thing, templates hurt the C++ compiler's ability to generate efficient code. This claim needs some support. C++ has notoriously slow compile times, but note that he's talking about efficiency of the code generated, not the efficiency of code generation itself, which I agree is damaged by templates. >
All the template parameters are fixed+known at compile-time. If there are compiler errors due to template instantiation, they must be caught at compile-time!
Unfortunately, this isn't possible because i is only available at runtime, while templates are compiled at compile time. This is a very important concept to understand when dealing with templates in C++: templates don't exist at runtime. All templates are compiled to real types at compile time.
Templates are a feature of the C++ programming language that allows functions and classes to operate with generic types. This allows a function or class to work on many different data types without being rewritten for each one.
At the time that the templated class Base is instantiated as a parent of the class Derived, the class Derived is not a complete type.
Since Base<Derived<DataClass> >
is a parent class of Derived<DataClass>
, it must be instantiated before Derived<DataClass>
can be instantiated. So when the class Base<Derived<DataClass> >
is built from the template, Derived<DataClass>
behaves as if it were a forward declaration. And as you're probably aware, you can't reference members of incomplete types, nor can your forward-declare nested types, so you're out of luck here.
This, by the way, is why it's difficult to implement a properly covariant clone() method using templates. See here and here (mine).
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With