Here is an example interface test.mli
, commented with ocamldoc-style comments:
(** ocamldoc module comment *)
open MissingModule;;
(** ocamldoc function comment *)
val test : unit;;
If I run the command ocamldoc test.mli
, I get the following error:
File "test.mli", line 2, characters 0-9:
Error: Unbound module MissingModule
1 error(s) encountered
Why should a documentation generator care about unbound modules?
That's because ocamldoc
fully qualifies type names. The file:
open MissingModule
val f: foo -> unit
is translated to
val f: MissingModule.foo -> unit
And MissingModule.foo
becomes a nice cross-reference to the definition of foo
in MissingModule
(if missingModule.mli
is given as argument to ocamldoc
).
And to complete the answer, in order to fully qualify type idents, you need to type the file you are processing. So ocamldoc
needs to be able to access to the corresponding .cmi
files.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With