I've noticed than even my simpler LINQ queries using GroupBy get translated into as many SQL queries as group keys. I haven't found any explanation as to why this happens or how I can avoid it.
For instance, the query:
from p in People group p by p.Name into g select g
gets translated into as many selects
as different values for the column Name
, just like this one:
-- Region Parameters
DECLARE @x1 VarChar(20) SET @x1 = 'John'
-- EndRegion
SELECT [t0].[Name], [t0].[SurName]
FROM [People] AS [t0]
WHERE ((@x1 IS NULL) AND ([t0].[Name] IS NULL))
OR ((@x1 IS NOT NULL) AND ([t0].[Name] IS NOT NULL) AND (@x1 = [t0].[Name]))
GO
However, if I bring the whole table to memory, such as calling AsEnumerable()
,
from p in People.AsEnumerable() group p by p.Name into g select g
just a single select is issued, retrieving all the rows and then LINQ performs the grouping in memory.
I find this behavior rather confusing and error-prone since I often find myself composing complex queries in different statements and I must be careful enough to call AsEnumerable
or ToList
before performing a GroupBy
or my performance gets degraded. Even worse, it forces me to finish my LINQ to SQL
query and continue with LINQ to Objects
.
I've tested this both using LINQ to Entities
and LINQ to SQL
(through LINQPad
), the DBMS being SQL Server
.
Am I missing something? Is this by design or is there any way to write the LINQ query in such a way that SQL's GROUP BY
is used instead of multiple individual queries being generated?
The working of the GroupBy operator is similar to the SQL GroupBy clause. It is used to return the group of elements which share the common attributes or key from the given sequence or collection. Every group is represented by IGrouping<TKey, TElement> object.
GroupBy & ToLookup return a collection that has a key and an inner collection based on a key field value. The execution of GroupBy is deferred whereas that of ToLookup is immediate. A LINQ query syntax can be end with the GroupBy or Select clause.
Advantages of LINQStandardized way of querying multiple data sources: The same LINQ syntax can be used to query multiple data sources. Compile time safety of queries: It provides type checking of objects at compile time. IntelliSense Support: LINQ provides IntelliSense for generic collections.
Compared to SQL, LINQ is simpler, tidier, and higher-level. It's rather like comparing C# to C++. Sure, there are times when it's still best to use C++ (as is the case with SQL), but in most situations, working in a modern tidy language and not having to worry about lower-level details is a big win.
You need to change your select statement so it is more SQL friendly.
change: select g
to something like this:
select new
{
g.Key,
Count = g.Count(),
};
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With