Our shop is integrating ASP.NET MVC into a large web application that utilizes custom & 3rd party HTTP Handlers defined in web.config under system.webServer\handlers. Leveraging HTTP Handlers in this way has been great for us because we don't need to recompile the app or have the actual handler page sitting on disk somewhere in the web scope for each instance of the product.
Is it really necessary to add explicit Ignore Routes in our global.asax so the Runtime can honor our Handlers defined in web.config? I would have thought Web.Routing would be invoked after the handlers defined in system.webServer\handlers have been checked (not the other way around).
We use a modular design that allows adding/dropping Handlers from web.config when features are added. With the introduction of MVC routing it appears we need to add ignore routes in the global.asax file for every possible handler defined in web.config.
Note the actual file to these Handlers don't exist on disk - they are virtual and embedded in an assembly. Here's an example of a 3rd party handler that now requires an explicit Ignore Route in global.asax:
<system.webServer>
<handlers>
<!-- telerik radcontrols -->
<add name="TelerikDialogHandler" verb="*" path="Telerik.Web.UI.DialogHandler.aspx" type="Telerik.Web.UI.DialogHandler, Telerik.Web.UI, Version=2009.1.402.20, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=121fae78165ba3d4"></add>
</handlers>
</system.webServer>
So for the record if you use System.Web.Routing you must include Ignore Routes for Http Handlers specified in Web.Config? Or perhaps I'm doing something wrong?
An ASP.NET HTTP handler is the process that runs in response to a request that is made to an ASP.NET Web application. The most common handler is an ASP.NET page handler that processes . aspx files. When users request an . aspx file, the request is processed by the page handler.
The three segments of a default route contain the Controller, Action and Id.
The Default route maps the first segment of a URL to a controller name, the second segment of a URL to a controller action, and the third segment to a parameter named id. The Default route maps this URL to the following parameters: controller = Home. action = Index.
An HTTPhandler may be defined as an end point that is executed in response to a request and is used to handle specific requests based on extensions. The ASP.Net runtime engine selects the appropriate handler to serve an incoming request based on the file extension of the request URL.
ASP.NET request processing is based on a pipeline model in which ASP.NET passes http requests to all the modules in the pipeline. Each module receives the http request and has full control over it. Once the request passes through all of the HTTP modules, it is eventually processed by an HTTP handler. The HTTP handler performs some processing on it, and the result again passes through the HTTP modules in the pipeline.
I think that the best way to think about these is that HttpModule is a filter that adds or subtracts something from the request object when an event occurs and the HttpHandler is a processor that actually serves the request. The ASP.NET request lifecycle is setup in such a way that all filters are applied to the request first before processing occurs.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With