Updated According to comments:
I have outlog.txt
file which contains multiple filenames, e.g: 2345_535_Dell&HP_3PAR_DEAL.txt
, similarly there are many filename but not the actual folder where the files are located and so in code am appending filenames to folderpath to get actual file location. Now,I want to get disk usage of all the files present in outlog.txt
and also total disk usage of all files present in outlog.txt
.
I have tried two approaches perl -s
and my ($size) = split(' ', du `"$folderpath/$_"`) but both approaches are giving me different values and also when I am using du
than am getting some numeric value but it does not give me unit, is there a way I can get human readable without using -h
option as it is not working on my system ?
Background Information
My goal is to get the size of a file, and currently I am using perl -s
to get filesize. I have also tried du
and am getting different values for the size of the same file. I am not able to understand how this works.
Q: Why do du
and perl -s
give different values for size? How do they internally work? Which of the two different values is the more accurate one? Also, I'm not sure why du -h filename
gives me an illegal expression error:
bash-2.03$ du -h test.txt
/usr/bin/du: illegal option -- h
usage: du [-a][-d][-k][-r][-o|-s][-L] [file ...]
Code:
my $folderpath = 'the_path';
open my $IN, '<', 'path/to/infile';
my $total;
while (<$IN>) {
chomp;
my $size = -s "$folderpath/$_";
print "$_ => $size\n";
$total += $size;
}
print "Total => $total\n";
Courtesy: RickF
Update:
Q:
How can I get the disk usage value instead of file size for each file present, meaning how can I get du value for each files rather than perl -s
values for file ?
OS Information uname :SunOS uname -v :Generic_117350-39
Updated Code: According to brain's approach but still du value prints as zero only and not the actual value, any suggestions ?
Update:
If I use my ($size) = split(' ', du "$folderpath/$_"
); than I am getting du value but it gives me some number, how can I get it into human readable without using -h
option ?
#!/usr/bin/perl
use strict;
use warnings;
my $folderpath = '/Project/upload';
open my $IN, '<', 'outlog.txt';
my $total;
while (<$IN>) {
chomp;
#my( $block_size, $blocks ) = ( stat( "$_" ) )[11,12];
#my $du_size = $block_size * $blocks;
my ($size) = split(' ', `du "$folderpath/$_");
#my $size = -s "$folderpath/$_";
print "$_ => $size\n";
$total += $size;
}
print "Total => $total\n";
du
reports actual disk usage, Perl's -s
reports the size of the file. So, if a file is four bytes long it will have a size of four bytes, but disk usage of four kilobytes (depending on how your filesystem is setup).
You will also see a difference in the sizes of sparse files. Sparse files take up less space than they claim to have in them.
By default, du
displays the number of blocks used by a file (where each block is 512 bytes on most systems), while perl's -s
displays bytes.
As to why your copy of du
doesn't have a -h option, you don't tell us what operating system you're using; it appears to include a horribly outdated version of the program.
UPDATE: to get disk usage in perl, you can use the Filesys::DiskUsage module.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With