I have just noticed that a multidimensional array in C# does not implement IEnumerable<T>
, while it does implement IEnumerable
. For single-dimensional arrays, both IEnumerable<T>
and IEnumerable
are implemented.
Why this difference? If a multi-dimensional array is IEnumerable
, surely it should also implement the generic version? I noticed this because I tried to use an extension method on a multidimensional array, which fails unless you use Cast<T>
or similar; so I can definitely see the an argument for making multidimensional arrays implement IEnumerable<T>
.
To clarify my question in code, I would expect the following code to print true
four times, while it actually prints true
, false
, true
, true
:
int[] singleDimensionArray = new int[10]; int[,] multiDimensional = new int[10, 10]; Debug.WriteLine(singleDimensionArray is IEnumerable<int>); Debug.WriteLine(multiDimensional is IEnumerable<int>); Debug.WriteLine(singleDimensionArray is IEnumerable); Debug.WriteLine(multiDimensional is IEnumerable);
It was mainly developed as a system programming language to write an operating system. The main features of the C language include low-level memory access, a simple set of keywords, and a clean style, these features make C language suitable for system programmings like an operating system or compiler development.
In C programming language, %d and %i are format specifiers as where %d specifies the type of variable as decimal and %i specifies the type as integer. In usage terms, there is no difference in printf() function output while printing a number using %d or %i but using scanf the difference occurs.
%d is used to print decimal(integer) number ,while %c is used to print character . If you try to print a character with %d format the computer will print the ASCII code of the character.
Role of Semicolon in C: Semicolons are end statements in C. The Semicolon tells that the current statement has been terminated and other statements following are new statements. Usage of Semicolon in C will remove ambiguity and confusion while looking at the code.
The CLR has two different kinds of arrays: vectors which are guaranteed to be one-dimensional with a lower bound of 0, and more general arrays which can have non-zero bounds and a rank other than 0.
From section 8.9.1 of the CLI spec:
Additionally, a created vector with element type T, implements the interface
System.Collections.Generic.IList<U>
(§8.7), where U := T.
I have to say it seems pretty weird to me. Given that it already implements IEnumerable
I don't see why it shouldn't implement IEnumerable<T>
. It wouldn't make as much sense to implement IList<T>
, but the simple generic interface would be fine.
If you want this, you could either call Cast<T>
(if you're using .NET 3.5) or write your own method to iterate through the array. To avoid casting you'd have to write your own method which found the lower/upper bounds of each dimension, and fetched things that way. Not terribly pleasant.
There is a workaround: you can convert any multidimensional array to an IEnumerable
public static class ArrayExtensions { public static IEnumerable<T> ToEnumerable<T>(this Array target) { foreach (var item in target) yield return (T)item; } }
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With