Logo Questions Linux Laravel Mysql Ubuntu Git Menu
 

Why can't I use context.read in build(), but I can use Provider.of with listen: false?

It's stated in the docs that these are the same, and context.read is just a shortcut for Provider.of<x>(context, listen: false). There's also an error in the console if I try to use context.read in a build method, but it doesn't explain the reason.

I also found this topic: Is Provider.of(context, listen: false) equivalent to context.read()? But it doesn't answer "why".

like image 269
Sergey Molchanovsky Avatar asked Jun 17 '20 15:06

Sergey Molchanovsky


People also ask

What is provider of context?

Every Context object comes with a Provider React component that allows consuming components to subscribe to context changes. The Provider component accepts a value prop to be passed to consuming components that are descendants of this Provider. One Provider can be connected to many consumers.

What is context read?

What are contexts of reading? Contexts of reading are all the elements that influence how we read in different situations. The context includes: 1) the setting, 2) the text, and 3) the purpose for reading. There are two main types of reading contexts.

How do you get build context in flutter?

Useful methods in BuildContext This method is used to locate or find a widget of a particular type in the widget tree. This method will go up the widget tree from the widget it was called from, and try to locate the first widget in the tree whose type is the same one passed to the method.


Video Answer


1 Answers

  • context.read is not allowed inside build because it is very dangerous to use there, and there are much better solutions available.

  • Provider.of is allowed in build for backward-compatibility.

Overall, the reasoning behind why context.read is not allowed inside build is explained in its documentation:

DON'T call [read] inside build if the value is used only for events:

Widget build(BuildContext context) {   // counter is used only for the onPressed of RaisedButton   final counter = context.read<Counter>();    return RaisedButton(     onPressed: () => counter.increment(),   ); } 

While this code is not bugged in itself, this is an anti-pattern. It could easily lead to bugs in the future after refactoring the widget to use counter for other things, but forget to change [read] into [watch].

CONSIDER calling [read] inside event handlers:

Widget build(BuildContext context) {   return RaisedButton(     onPressed: () {       // as performant as the previous previous solution, but resilient to refactoring       context.read<Counter>().increment(),     },   ); } 

This has the same efficiency as the previous anti-pattern, but does not suffer from the drawback of being brittle.

DON'T use [read] for creating widgets with a value that never changes

Widget build(BuildContext context) {   // using read because we only use a value that never changes.   final model = context.read<Model>();    return Text('${model.valueThatNeverChanges}'); } 

While the idea of not rebuilding the widget if something else changes is good, this should not be done with [read]. Relying on [read] for optimisations is very brittle and dependent on an implementation detail.

CONSIDER using [select] for filtering unwanted rebuilds

Widget build(BuildContext context) {   // Using select to listen only to the value that used   final valueThatNeverChanges = context.select((Model model) => model.valueThatNeverChanges);    return Text('$valueThatNeverChanges'); } 

While more verbose than [read], using [select] is a lot safer. It does not rely on implementation details on Model, and it makes impossible to have a bug where our UI does not refresh.

like image 58
Rémi Rousselet Avatar answered Nov 07 '22 06:11

Rémi Rousselet