When I declare a variable function<void(const Foo&)>
, the compiler still lets me assign a lambda that accepts a value:
function<void(const Foo&)> handler;
handler = [](Foo f){};
(cfr. also http://cpp.sh/5dsp)
So when the handler is called, a copy will be made. What section of the standard allows this? Is there a way I can flag the client code that this will be a problem (some static_assert of sorts?)?
Per [func.wrap.func.con]
std::function<R(ArgTypes...)>
has a
template<class F> function& operator=(F&& f);
with the following remark:
This assignment operator shall not participate in overload resolution unless decay_t<F> is Lvalue-Callable for argument types ArgTypes... and return type R.
where
A callable type F is Lvalue-Callable for argument types ArgTypes and return type R if the expression INVOKE<R>(declval<F&>(), declval<ArgTypes>()...), considered as an unevaluated operand, is well formed.
So you can assign to an std::function<R(ArgTypes...)>
any function callable with ArgTypes...
and returning something implicitly convertible to R
.
I don't see how to prevent this short of wrapping an std::function
in something more limited.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With