Usually, F# does not allow pattern variables to occur twice in the same pattern. But in the following code, F# does not complain - is this a bug?
type foo = { A: int }
let test (x, {A = x}) = x
let result = test ("bla", {A = 3})
I don't think this is a bug, although it seems confusing, but it's just the way the compiler compiles the above value binding.
Section 14.6.3 states that if the value definition is not a single value pattern (as is the case here), the elaborated expression is
tmp <typars1… typarsn> = expr
ident1 <typars1> = expr1
…
identn <typarsn> = exprn
where tmp is a fresh identifier and each expri results from the compilation of the pattern pat (§7) against input tmp [from spec].
To see what the compiler does, we could use an F# quotation, e.g.:
<@ let test (x:int, {A = x:int})= x in test (3, {A = 5}) @>;;
In string format I get (leaving some stuff out):
Let (test,
Lambda (tupledArg,
Let (x, TupleGet (tupledArg, 0),
Let (_arg1, TupleGet (tupledArg, 1),
Let (x, PropertyGet (Some (_arg1), A, []), x)))),
Application (test, NewTuple (Value (3), NewRecord (foo, Value (5)))))
which is why we get the "inner" x.
I don't think it's a bug but perhaps it would be more consistent if this would generate a warning.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With