I was reading about __noop and the MSDN example is
#if DEBUG
#define PRINT printf_s
#else
#define PRINT __noop
#endif
int main() {
PRINT("\nhello\n");
}
and I don't see the gain over just having an empty macro:
#define PRINT
The generated code is the same. What's a valid example of using __noop
that actually makes it useful?
The
__noop
intrinsic specifies that a function should be ignored and the argument list be parsed but no code be generated for the arguments. It is intended for use in global debug functions that take a variable number of arguments.
In your case the argument is an obviously side effect free expression that can be easily optimized out, so it doesn't matter.
But if the argument expression has side effects or is so complex that the compiler can't prove that it terminates normally and has no side-effects then using __noop
prevents the potentially expensive evaluation of that expression.
The second benefit is that it behaves like a function call with a variable number of arguments syntactically. So substituting it for a function call doesn't affect the parsing of the program. With some other replacements (like the empty string), that might be a problem in some situations.
#define PRINT
extern int some_complicated_calculation();
PRINT("%d\n", some_complicated_calculation());
would call the function even though you don't want the result.
Using __noop
, the function won't be called.
You could (assuming the compiler supports variadic macros) define PRINT
to ignore the arguments; but then they won't be parsed at all, and may become invalid if you change the code around them without compiling the variant that defines PRINT
to do something. Using __noop
, the arguments are still parsed, so are more likely to remain valid.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With