Which is faster: Union
or Concat
?
I don't care about the order of the elements.
Enumerable.Union Method
Enumerable.Concat Method
Do you only care about execution speed? How long does it take you to process an element when you receive it?
Concat
is simpler - it doesn't need to perform any processing itself, or buffer the results that it's already returned. However, it will produce more results if there are any elements in the intersection. If you're going to take a long time to process each result, Concat
may end up effectively being slower.
Union
removes duplicates. Concat
does not.
So, they produce different results if the sources either contain any items in common, or have any internal duplicates.
If you can guarantee there are no duplicates, or if there are few and you don't care about having them in your output, Concat
will be faster since there's no need to test each value against what has already been yielded.
However, if there are many duplicates and you don't need them, the extra processing in Union
to remove the dupes may be offset by the savings in your code that consumes the results.
What was said above is right. Here is just a little addition for some special cases:
If you have to concatenate for example two lists and if you need full speed, consider using yield
. Of course this is a lot less flexible and comfortable than Union
or Concat
in Linq. Therefore it makes only sense in special cases.
This property for example will provide the same as List1.Concat(List2)
public IEnumerable<MyObject> AllObjects
{
get
{
foreach (MyObject o1 in List1)
yield return o1;
foreach (MyObject o2 in List2)
yield return o2;
}
}
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With